247
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] buffaloseven@kbin.social 45 points 6 months ago

I describe it to people I know as:

  • Fallout 4 is, far and away, the best "game" of the modern ones. It feels much better to play in almost every way than the other ones. Especially the combat. There's some interesting stuff in it, but it's largely the mechanics that keep you coming back, not the RPG or world.
  • Fallout 3 has perhaps the better realized world out of them all; the way it all fits together is great and there's a lot of rewarding exploration in it.
  • Fallout: New Vegas is, far and away, the best Fallout game...it harkens back to the roots way more and is the best RPG -- by a long shot -- of the 3.

Obviously YMMV and others will feel differently, but that's how I've parsed out this series so far.

[-] Damage@feddit.it 24 points 6 months ago

People really are afraid of Fallout 1 & 2's age, it seems. But they are still the best.

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 2 points 6 months ago

It's less the age and more that they just plain don't play well. They always feel like you're supposed to be in control of a full party but you never are, even once you finally get companions they're AI controlled (and it's not even a good AI).

[-] Piafraus@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

I never had this feeling. It's an RPG, I can build and control only my character

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 months ago

It's fairly common for CRPGs to give you full control over your party and their builds. I'm pretty sure you could in the original Wasteland (I'll admit I never played it), which was a game that heavily influenced Fallout.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

I got that free game from Epic a while back: Encased. It took the isometric gameplay/feel from the first 2.5 fallout games and modernized them pretty well. I haven't finished it (my character is a psychic god. it's fun, but I've kind of lost the thread of the story. I think I'm in act 3 or something) but a mod porting FO1 or FO2 to that engine would be sweet.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

Btw those are also on sale. Steam has a Fallout Classics bundle with FO1, FO2, and FO Tactics for $5

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 1 points 6 months ago

I have a space in my heart reserved for Fallout Tactics: Brotherhood of Steel. :')

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 13 points 6 months ago

Fallout4 has so much nonsense "game" in it with the way levels work. All of the modern ones are pretty bad about it ("headshot on the naked bandit! ... he's fine, he's level 30"), but FO4 was especially egregious.

Also the way it does power armor is kind of stupid. You can tell they wanted to have power armor early on for some marketing wow, but it cheapened it for me.

[-] Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

See, what they need to do is update the graphics on 1 & 2. I would definitely replay those, bugs and all. Bozar was of course OP but the way it was so story driven was excellent.

The only issue is the potato graphics.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 10 points 6 months ago

Not only the graphic, the control is clunky and the UI is hard to navigate, it need to be remastered with QOL update to modern standard. I can look past the graphic but the control really need a lot of getting used to.

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago

I usually don't really care about the graphics, but these Bethesda games are just ugly as fuck. It's the kind of ugly i can't deal with.

[-] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 3 points 6 months ago

Emm we're talking about FO1/2 tho.

[-] hand@lemmy.studio 2 points 6 months ago

I think that's a little harsh. Can I ask what you feel is wrong with the graphics as they are?

I'm currently playing Fallout and my only issue is the UI scaling, the graphics themselves I find quite charming.

[-] DarkMetatron@feddit.de 7 points 6 months ago

I really like Fallout 3 but the ton of invisible walls and the shitty metro tunnels turn it into a game I often hate to play.

[-] evranch@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

I played 3 and NV on 360, both games were badly marred by being as much loading zone as they were game. Ruined the experience of snooping around for loot and side quests as opening a door back into the wasteland could take minutes. I had to stick to mostly the main quest.

4 was a far better "game" for being played on PC, but I agree NV plot was great. I just didn't want to replay and get the different endings, as the game itself was painful to play.

I should replay them on PC someday, especially if there are graphical update mods available.

[-] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

The main problem with FO4 is the voiced PC and the asinine dialogue structure. The map is amazing, I'd argue it's better than the F:NV map.

this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
247 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16665 readers
608 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS