755
teachings
(mander.xyz)
A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.
Rules
This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.
i think this is a really clean explanation of why (-3) * (-3) should equal
9
. i wanted to point out that with a little more work, it's possible to see why (-3) * (-3) must equal 9. and this is basically a consequence of the distributive law:the first equality uses
0 * anything = 0
. the second equality uses(3 + -3) = 0
. the third equality uses the distribute law, and the fourth equality uses3 * (-3) = -9
, which was shown in the previous comment.so, by adding
9
to both sides, we get:in other words,
9 = (-3) * (-3)
. this basically says that if we want the distribute law to be true, then we need to have (-3) * (-3) = 9.it's also worth mentioning that this is a specific instance of a proof that shows
(-a) * (-b) = a * b
is true for arbitrary rings. (a ring is basically a fancy name for a structure with addition and distribute multiplication.) so, any time you want to have any kind of multiplication that satisfies the distribute law, you need (-a) * (-b) = a * b.in particular,
(-A) * (-B) = A * B
is also true whenA
andB
are matrices. and you can prove this using the same argument that was used above.