203
submitted 7 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 30 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Democrats aren’t taking advantage, republicans are. Why do you think independent candidates are funded primarily by GOP PACs but use moderate platforms? They know anyone educated enough to find value in a moderate candidate would never have voted for Trump.

[-] anticolonialist@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

They are taking advantage of the situation by ignoring voters telling him to stop genocide. They believe they can do whatever they want and voters will still reward him with another opportunity to keep doing it.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 22 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The US has always been too easy on Israel. I agree that Biden needs to stand firm on his recent insistence of diplomacy after the attack, and take action if Netanyahu doesn’t agree to follow.

The honest truth is that none of the other choices will be better, and Trump will be far, far worse.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

The honest truth is that none of the other choices will be better, and Trump will be far, far worse.

This is exactly what taking advantage looks like.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

We’re having the same conversation again, just one thread down. Lol

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

"You have to vote for us no matter how badly we behave because the alternative is worse."

That is taking advantage. If you don't see that, I can't explain it any more clearly.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 8 points 7 months ago

We can acknowledge that Trump is a fascist and people need to vote for Biden or there is a real possibility of not being able to vote again.

We can also acknowledge that as a result Democrats don't have to try very hard and can present a boring "mostly status quo" candidate under the banner of "what are you going to do, let a fascist win?"

Yes, it sucks. We can acknowledge it sucks. Personally I think the best way to correct course is if the Republicans lose hard to send the message that they need to be putting forward reasonable candidates to stand a chance, at which point it would be reasonable to not vote for disappointing Democratic candidates.

We can still acknowledge that what is being offered isn't stellar.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I agree that he’s not stellar. So do the polls. My point is that third-party candidates aren’t spoiling the republican nomination, even though they’re funded by republicans. They’re running specifically to pull anti-Trump votes from Biden, and have a real effect on the potential for a second term for Trump.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 months ago

I agree, the point OP was making is that Biden and the Democrats are taking advantage of Trump being the nominee by not trying very hard because "who else are you going to vote for?"

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I follow. Biden knows he’s polling way too low to be strong-arming the vote. That’s not what is influencing his lack of action regarding Netanyahu. This is how the US have handled the Iran-Israel proxy conflict since the 80’s. I do not think it’s right either. I do know that republicans have wanted an active Iranian war for decades though. That’s why the House is stalling the Ukraine/Israel support bill that’s already passed the Senate in favor of the new Israel aid bill currently being drafted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran%E2%80%93Israel_proxy_conflict

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Democrats aren’t taking advantage

Yes, they absolutely are. It's why they're supporting the genocide every last centrist has always wanted. They can get away with it because the other option is worse.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

You think Trump would be better? Republicans have been bloodthirsty for an Iran conflict for decades.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

You think Trump would be better?

No, I don't.

I think Democrats are taking advantage of this in order to move as far to the right as being second worst will allow.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
203 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3382 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS