1066
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

You're not a "raging leftist" if you vote for Biden. At least vote PSL or Green

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 29 points 8 months ago

This post is about you, you idiot.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Your vote for Dems is what endangers the vulnerable like those in poverty. You consent to wealth and income inequality with your vote, and can only blame yourself for not improving your country.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

What do you think happens if I do that?

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Actual progress towards changing the Democratic party instead of consenting to it's right wing policies that are enabled by your vote.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I did that in 2016 and it didn’t progress shit. It made it worse like it will if we do that this year. I organized and pushed leftists in primaries and I was beaten by "moderates." Specifically, nobody had a chance against the incumbent. It fucking sucks but I don’t want a declared fascist putting more assholes on judicial benches or pushing anti-trans, anti-women policies.

I’m with you on both parties sucking. But please, grow up. If you want to help, do it before the nominees are set. And don’t drag others into your misguided principles.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I did that in 2016 and it didn’t progress shit.

Did your lazy ass do anything else?

If you want to help, do it before the nominees are set.

Jill Stein is a good candidate in a historically weak election for the ruling class.

I've gotten dozens of people to vote Green in my state, what have you done?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 6 points 8 months ago

"There are dozens of us." lol

wtf have I done? I already said. Organized and gotten people elected to school boards, city council, and our mayor too. We primaried for state and federal elections but didn’t get our candidates. We didn’t pout and waste our votes on people who had no chance of getting elected. We sucked it the fuck up and tried to make sure Republicans didn’t get elected.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I've been looking through your comments and have confirmed you are a fake. Where can I see any evidence of your "efforts" to help the Green party?

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I don't believe you at all. Any person informed enough to do what you said knows voting for Democrats only makes out situation worse by consenting to neoliberal capitalism. None of the hundreds of people affiliated with the Green party I've met have said that, so you're lying.

[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 3 points 8 months ago

voting for Democrats only makes out situation worse

Tell me you're not a pregnant woman who needs obstetric care of any kind or a capitol policeman or trans or Hispanic or a person who's trying to get sick days from their union or a Ukrainian

by consenting to neoliberal capitalism

Yes, everyone knows that simply not consenting to the system suddenly makes it go away. Just ask anyone who's ever been on a traffic stop -- you just have to tell the policeman you do not consent, and all of a sudden, everything changes, and it works out better that you didn't go along with the system.

If only the civil rights movement had been privy to this knowledge, they could have done their decades of work to make the system better much more simply and easily

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Tell me you’re not a pregnant woman who needs obstetric care of any kind or a capitol policeman or trans or Hispanic or a person who’s trying to get sick days from their union or a Ukrainian

Dems can't fix that or they won't be able to run on it anymore. They have plenty of opportunities especially the super majority under Obama.

Yes, everyone knows that simply not consenting to the system suddenly makes it go away.

Never made that argument, bad gaslighting attempt. Green part hits even 5% and Dems start doing what you want.

If only the civil rights movement had been privy to this knowledge

This actually goes against your argument, civil violence was the only reason anything happened for that movement, and you're advocating for voting for Dems and not getting in the streets.

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Well, that’s just a bad argument.

Good day, sir.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Fake lefty trying to scrounge up votes for your capitalist daddy Dems

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Project 2025, stupid. Letting Trump win means no progressive wins again in this country. Anti progress.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Letting ~~Trump~~ Biden win means no progressive wins again in this country.

Imagine thinking you're defending democracy by voting for someone you don't want. LOL

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Wow, you can type the opposite thing that someone said and pretend that you have a point. How incredibly stupid of you.

What exactly is Biden's plan to avoid letting a progressive win in the country ever again? Because Trump is the one with Project 2025.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Imagine thinking you’re defending democracy by voting for someone you don’t want. LOL

I, on the other hand, express democracy by voting for a candidate that I support, Jill Stein.

What exactly is Biden’s plan to avoid letting a progressive win in the country ever again?

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/dnc-war-third-party-candidates-rcna143290

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

But Jill Stein is not going to win, even if you vote for her. Voting for her works against your interests.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

My interest is growing the Green party so it is in my interests to vote for her, and convince others to do the same so Dems will feel threatened enough to help poor people.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

If you want the Green Party to grow, then you should do the best you can to prevent Trump's lackeys from totally hijacking the executive branch and instilling actual literal fascism.

You know, the more of your comments I read, the more I'm pretty sure you're a Russian troll

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

If you want the Green Party to grow, then you should do the best you can to ~~prevent Trump’s lackeys from totally hijacking the executive branch and instilling actual literal fascism.~~ gather votes for them

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

Yes, in the 1,460 days between elections. On election day, you should take the action that's most likely to result in the best outcome, and this year it is too late for anyone other than Biden or Trump to win.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Yes, in the 1,460 days between elections

Where have you been? I've been supporting, donating, gather votes. You're a fraud.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

Hey wait a second that link only details democrats' plans to beat 3rd party candidates in this election, not a plan to instill actual literal fascism, gutting environmental regulations, and ensuring that no one can reimpose those regulations for as long as this country remains this country

Did you even read the link you sent?

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Hey wait a second that link only details democrats’ plans to ~~beat 3rd party candidates in this election,~~ keep third parties off the ballot because they are anti-democratic

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

You're not a "raging leftist" if you vote for Biden. At least ~~vote PSL or Green~~ use a brutal domestic terrorism campaign as leverage to blackmail politicians into overturning first-past-the-post as part of a multi-prong strategy that, even as extreme as you are, still includes a pragmatic hedge in the form of a vote for the lesser of two evils

Of course nobody should be terrorizing anyone. What I’m riffing off of is a perspective someone shared that basically you don’t protest with a vote for a loser, you protest by agitating for systemic change.

In the meantime while the broken system is in place, you feed it a minimally shitty input.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

use a brutal domestic terrorism campaign

The fuck? Just vote for third parties where did you get that bullshit from?

In the meantime while the broken system is in place, you feed it a minimally shitty input.

You consent to this system with a vote for Dems.

[-] brbposting@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Reasonable people can definitely disagree on this.

One thing that may be interesting to think about: some percentage of the time an argument is made disingenuously to try to siphon off votes. An entirely genuine recommendation of an identical strategy is fair – as I said reasonable people can disagree – but perhaps calls for some introspection.

It’s too bad when your strategy mirrors that of your worst enemy! So the far leftist could perhaps instead chain himself to legislators’ doors (vehement objection to the system) while consenting to acknowledge reality with a disgusted harm reduction vote for the marginally less-bad elderly man.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

Do you think being incredibly stupid is a prereq for being a raging leftist or something?

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Do you think being incredibly stupid is a prereq for being a raging leftist or something?

It is a prereq for voting for Biden

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago

No, understanding how the voting system works isn't stupid

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

You misunderstand the voting system because you vote for someone you don't like.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The best available choice isn't always one that you want to make. It's fine to hate the idea of voting strategically, I hate it too, but it's naive to think you can positively affect the system by going with the option you want the most.

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Voting for someone you disagree with is not voting strategically, it's voting against your interests based on what you assume others will do.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No, we can say with absolute certainty that (barring any issues with mortality) either Trump or Biden will win this year. I assume others will vote for those two for the same reason I assume that the sun will rise tomorrow.

ETA: I was right about the sunrise. Check back in a few months to find out if I was right about the president!

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

And in 2028?

Your lazy ass will be making the same argument. I will actually express democracy unlike you, and will work to gather votes for the Greens.

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

If a green party candidate stands an actual chance of winning in 28, then I will absolutely vote for them

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

So you're too lazy to support them and gather votes for them, you don't actually support them then. You're too lazy so you vote for Dems to make yourself feel better

[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 months ago

That's a hell of an assumption to make

[-] goldenlocks@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Cry about it, it's the truth. Where you been since 2016?

this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2024
1066 points (100.0% liked)

People Twitter

5396 readers
415 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS