118
submitted 7 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aleph@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

You only addressed half the statement. They are not saying that Israel doesn't take civilian hostages. They are questioning the claim that Hamas doesn't take civilian hostages. Follow the thread please.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Is there any evidence that Hamas has taken new hostages since October 7th? Because AFAIK there isn't.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

A temporal attribute has not been included in this statement:

Hamas just hasn’t been taking civilian noncombatants as hostages like Israel has been doing.

But you have added a temporal qualifier:

taken new hostages since October 7th

I think maybe that's where the disconnect is? I don't know. I don't know who or what you're arguing against.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The temporal qualifier is inherent in the grammar of the statement. Perhaps you didn't notice it?

In English, the present perfect continuous has/hasn't been taking implies a frequent and repeated action since a fixed time in the past - in this case, presumably, the start of the current conflict until now.

Since Hamas only took civilian hostages on one occasion, i.e. October 7th, and not again since, it is not true to say that Hamas "has been taking hostages". They took hostages. Once.

Israel, on the other hand, have been taking Palestinian civilians captive, repeatedly, since October 7th. That's the difference.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

You're inferring the start point for the perfect continuous and assigning Oct 7; I'm assigning the start point to be the overall conflict in a broader context. I'm being charitable. I might be wrong, but I can't read OPs mind so I'm being charitable.

[-] aleph@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

In that case, they would have used the present simple, "Hamas don't take hostages", but they didn't.

I think you simply misunderstood the original statement.

[-] TheFonz@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

I could be wrong. I'm happy to take the L. Not a hill I want to die on.

this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
118 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38987 readers
1860 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS