168
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] takeda@lemmy.world 62 points 8 months ago

I also like this one:

“Just the other day a defeated-looking man came up to me and said, ‘Mr. President, I have crushing debt, and I’m completely wiped out,’” Biden said at a fundraiser. “And I had to look at him and say, ‘Donald, I’m sorry. I can’t help you.’”

[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

Not my style of campaigning but that's a solid zinger there ngl

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Millionaire president tells poors to get fucked. American as Apple pie.

[-] naught@sh.itjust.works 15 points 8 months ago

Is your back okay? Those mental gymnastics look hard for even someone half your age

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

When you grow up you'll realize mental gymnastics aren't a physical action.

Which part of my comment would you say is disingenuine?

[-] naught@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago

I'll assume you understand metaphor/wordplay despite the jab.

You place Trump in remotely the same category as the "poors" which is comical. Obviously Biden doesn't make this joke about moms on WIC, etc., ie the real poors. You use more charged language like "millionaire president", but when was the last president who wasnt wealthy? What is your point? You can't place the Bidens' wealth remotely near the true robber barons, but thats what you attempt to evoke.

You have not presented facts, but rather used manipulative language endearing to Trump

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

I'm saying it's poor messaging by the dems. This is ammo for Fox News and the like.

Not all criticism of the president is support for Trump.

[-] naught@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Idk Biden making jibes and jokes makes him appear mentally with it which contrasts the fox news narrative. It's not as mean spirited as Trump has been and even comes off as tongue in cheek IMO. I can see more positives than negatives, but I can also see it being spun by hacks, sure.

This particular joke was aimed at none other than Trump, so you saying this is Biden dunking on the poors does place you in a precarious position of calling Dolan a "poor" and defending him

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I think these two ghouls are the worst America has to offer, one being a paid Zionist, the other an incompetent fascist.

[-] macaro 6 points 8 months ago

Just that particular poor.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Biden has been paid over 5 million dollars since 1990 by pro Israel groups. That's what you're celebrating here. The rich politician who's aiding a genocide making fun of being poor..

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

that's $150K a year over 30 years, and that's aggregated from numerous groups. He's raised something like 70 million in the last year alone. Is your point that the influence from "pro Israel" groups is statistical noise?

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Just that a neoliberal will excuse literal genocide if it's their guy being paid to do it.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 6 points 8 months ago

But the numbers don't add up. He's probably being paid more money from people that want him to stop. I'm saying the money doesn't seem to have any influence one way or the other.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Well I brought receipts and you brought assumptions. Looks a lot like bribery from here.

Also who the fuck are you? only $150,000 a year for 30 years??

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

what receipts? You posted a number and no proof. I literally just did math on your comment.

and 150K is one fifth of one percent (0.02%) of what the DNC raised the last quarter of 2023.

If you're trying to prove money==influence, you've successfully argued that no one is buying much of any influence with DNC for $150K a year.

I'm not even arguing for or against your point, I'm just trying to point out that you're providing evidence against the point you're trying to make.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago
[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 2 points 8 months ago

Yeah, again, that's a drop on the bucket over 30 years. It works as evidence against your point.

[-] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I absolutely couldn't disagree more.

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Just trying to help you with your quest

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
168 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2112 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS