270

Five-decade UK study finds that aggression at school leads to better-paying jobs, while those with emotional instability went on to earn less

Children who displayed aggressive behaviour at school, such as bullying or temper outbursts, are likely to earn more money in middle age, according to a five-decade study that upends the maxim that bullies do not prosper.

They are also more likely to have higher job satisfaction and be in more desirable jobs, say researchers from the Institute for Social and Economic Research at the University of Essex.

The paper, published today, used data about almost 7,000 people born in 1970 whose lives have been tracked by the British Cohort Study. The research team examined data from primary school teachers who assessed the children’s social and emotional skills when they were 10 years old in 1980, and matched it to their lives at the age of 46 in 2016.

“We found that those children who teachers felt had problems with attention, peer relationships and emotional instability did end up earning less in the future, as we expected, but we were surprised to find a strong link between aggressive behaviour at school and higher earnings in later life,” said Prof Emilia Del Bono, one of the study’s authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

Oh man the “Capitalism bad” button is going to get really really tired at this pace.

Maybe bullies have been around and thriving even prior to capitalism. I bet lots of people would have felt “bullied” by Genghis Khan.

[-] czech@lemm.ee 63 points 1 year ago

They didn't suggest bullying is exclusive to capitalism, right?

Maybe bullies are more prosperous in particular economic systems.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

I think “bullies prosper” is a part of the human condition

[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 37 points 1 year ago

I think you’re using this as an excuse to never learn emotional intelligence.

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didn’t realize we had Dr. Phil in the thread wow, thanks for your contribution. Definitely revealing nothing about yourself there.

[-] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 25 points 1 year ago

There you go jumping to conclusions again

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 3 points 1 year ago

Mutual aid is also part of the human condition, so it's not like we need systems like capitalism and authoritarianism to survive

There are definitely systems in which bullies are far less likely to prosper

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I can’t think of a single system we’ve set up that bullies haven’t taken over and ruined. Capitalism is one among many. Yes, capitalism bad, but bad perspective worse.

[-] LinkOpensChest_wav 2 points 1 year ago

a single system we’ve set up

You're right. We've pretty consistently fucked things up as western nations. We all subscribe to an inherently inequitable system and then fail to entertain alternatives. My country (USA) even straight-up denies residency and citizenship to anyone who doesn't join the capitalist circlejerk.

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 1 year ago

Your comment implies there are non-Western nations that don't allow bullies to thrive. If you can provide examples that would answer the commenter's question.

[-] TCGM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It's worse. Certain economic and social systems are designed to make the only viable, or most viable, survival strategy to be a sociopath or worse. Most people are forced to cosplay that at some level in these systems, whether they have those traits naturally or not, in order to survive. And despite human nature being communal, it's more powerful in survival adaptation.

And it worked for genghis as it does for capitalists. What’s the issue?

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Be the change you want to see my guy.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I am, I was just responding to your question

[-] TCGM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm morbidly curious as to when you think capitalism started, considering your take here :V

Hint: it was fire

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, bigger rams have been knocking around smaller rams since the advent of fire, which was when capitalism started. Thanks for all the big brain takes on this, I wish I’d get a better tally of how many complete dumbasses there are around here. 70 and counting.

[-] TCGM@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for being my first block here, you galactic brain simpleton, you ;)

this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2024
270 points (100.0% liked)

science

20575 readers
300 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS