130
submitted 7 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

They're still way too expensive for most people to afford even with the current financial help available.

If you want to roll these out you'll need to do a government scheme to roll these out for people.

And if you're going to do that, you're better off with a government scheme for free insulation and window glazing. It'll be a much cheaper scheme and still cut CO2 emissions from boiler usage.

I'd argue for the roll out of a government scheme for insulation and a "Lifetime ISA" style financial vehicle where homeowners save some money each month and the government adds 25% into the account up to £1000. That way if you max the contributions, people would be able to afford the cost of a heat pump and installation in 2 to 3 years.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 8 points 7 months ago

In a world where we need to get fossil fuel use to zero, we need to provide support for both adding insulation and shifting from a fossil boiler to a heat pump.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 6 points 7 months ago

Properly sized heat pumps are nowhere near as expensive as many people think. It's primarily an issue of needed heating capacity bring massively over estimated. Technology Connections has put out a great video recently that goes over it far better than I could, and he has had a similar experience with his parents as I did mine. The HVAC company wanted to replace with a heat pump of the same size as the furnace. A furnace that had at minimum 2.5× the capacity that they actually needed.

this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
130 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5152 readers
536 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS