512
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Trump fears he may have to "sell Great Assets, perhaps at Fire Sale prices"

Former President Donald Trump lashed out at the judge who imposed a $450+ million penalty in his New York fraud case after his lawyers admitted he was unable to secure a bond to appeal the case.

Trump’s lawyers on Monday asked a New York appeals court to stay the enforcement of the judgment in his fraud case, saying it has been impossible to secure a bond necessary to appeal the judgment after approaching 30 different underwriters.

The former president lashed out at the judge on Truth Social after the filing.

“Engoron wants me to put up the ridiculous fine (I DID NOTHING WRONG!) before I get a chance to Appeal his crazed ruling - A first!” Trump falsely wrote. New York law requires a defendant to put up the full judgment amount with interest in order to appeal a civil judgment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 79 points 8 months ago

It's more than just not commiting crimes. These are civil judgements, after all, and technically not criminal matters. But at their heart, we will find lots and lots of lying. Lying about his interaction with Carroll, lying about the values of his properties, all very public lies. Lying to the point where, when his lies are exposed, he keeps lying. His dishonesty has no limits.

It amazes me that people admire that.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 28 points 8 months ago

It's a Catch -22. He's rich, therefore he must be smart. The people who vote for him think it's their fault they haven't got money. They love him because he acts the way they would if they were rich.

I like to read old comics. Pretty much every Superman cover from the 1950s shows Supes doing something that looks stupid or evil. "Why Is Superman Throwing Lois Into a Volcano?" And of course there's always a great reason, because Superman can never be a bad guy.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I actually wrote a thesis on that, the turning point for Superman covers was more in the late 60s, around the time of the Tet Offensive in '68.

Pre-1968 Superman covers:

(1965)

(1966)

Post-1968 Superman covers:

(1969)

(1970)

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 8 months ago

So you gonna leave us hanging? Why did Superman throw Lois into a volcano?!

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

He never could get the hang of Thursdays 🤷

[-] Telcontar@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago

I'm loving this new crossover. His cape would have to be made of terry cloth

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Sass that hoopy Clark Kent! There's a frood who knows where his towel is!

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

"I caught Clark Kent listening to Vogon poetry and he didn't even have a minor aneurysm! I think he might be invulnerable."

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

A] Alien shapeshifter revealed when they transform to escape

B] Robot duplicate

C] Only way to reverse a magic spell

D] She was pegging Perry White and that shit will not stand.

E] All of the above

[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

It really is wild to me how people equate wealth with intelligence. So many people think the biggest dumbasses in the world are literal geniuses just because they got tons of money lol it's crazy.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

People don't admire the fact he's a liar.

They admire him because he's a racist, homophobe, and transphobe.

They admire him because he says things they wish they could say without getting yelled at by liberals.

They are okay if he's a liar, sexist, misogynist asshole so long as he's also racist, homophobic, and transphobic.

[-] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Don't forget that he also promised them all their wildest dreams if they only bow down and worship him.

[-] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

"Man does not live on bread alone."

"Scoff. Socialist."

[-] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The misogyny and sexism unfortunately are also on the other side of that, for more than half the people who follow him. Since some of the women are also conditioned to see that as a good thing. And most of the men, of course.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 4 points 8 months ago

And a bunch of poor people paying his and his billionaire friends bills for them.

this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
512 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2484 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS