627
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

An ex-MAGA activist warns "no civic savior is coming" as Donald Trump's cognitive decline becomes undeniable

What if Donald Trump defeats President Biden and takes control of the White House in 2025? He has already announced his plans to become the country’s first dictator, and to launch a reign of terror and revenge against his so-called enemies. As detailed in documents such as Project 2025, Agenda 47, and elsewhere, the infrastructure is being created right now to put Trump's neofascist plans to end multiracial pluralistic democracy in effect on “day one." The so-called resistance will not have the courtesy of ramping up or mobilizing to stop Dictator Trump’s onslaught. It will be a “shock and awe” campaign visited upon the American people.

Dictator Trump’s reign of terror will be made even worse by the fact that as shown during recent speeches, interviews, and at other events he appears to be encountering severe difficulties in cognition, language, and memory.

In a series of recent conversations with me here at Salon, Dr. John Gartner, a prominent psychologist and contributor to the bestselling book "The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump: 27 Psychiatrists and Mental Health Experts Assess a President," has issued this warning: “Not enough people are sounding the alarm, that based on his behavior, and in my opinion, Donald Trump is dangerously demented. In fact, we are seeing the opposite among too many in the news media, the political leaders and among the public. There is also this focus on Biden's gaffes or other things that are well within the normal limits of aging. By comparison, Trump appears to be showing gross signs of dementia. This is a tale of two brains. Biden's brain is aging. Trump's brain is dementing.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The country genuinely does need a competitive second party.

Everyone blames Democrats for the lack of choice in candidates, while the other guys are nominating a twice impeached, adjudicated rapist and insurrection supporter with ninety one criminal indictments and multiple pending civil suits.

I haven't had a candidate come out of the GOP worthy of consideration in my entire lifetime. At one point, they were the party of not only Lincoln but folks like Eisenhower.

[-] olivebranch@lemmy.ca 6 points 6 months ago
[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

2016 was 8 years ago, and I think it's rather weird and conspiratorial to blame Hillary for Trump in the first place. She might've had a preferred opponent but she certainly didn't control the GOP. She barely controlled the DNC. She had a hard fought primary with Bernie who wasn't even a member of the party, and had a relatively low national profile before the election.

This points at exactly what I'm talking about above. To hear you tell it, Democrats are somehow the only people with agency in the entire political landscape.

[-] olivebranch@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 months ago

Politicians have no real agency, it is the rich that control the entire political landscape. They liked Hilary and Trump, and they told them to support elevate each other so that no matter who wins, they get their way. They do this in every election, same major donors fund both sides.

Democrats and Republicans are just puppets that pretend they are against each other, but in reality they are on the same side working for the same employers and getting votes by bashing each other.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

So you had a long think on this response and decided that your take that Hillary was responsible for Trump was too nuanced? 😆

There are material differences between Democrats and Republicans and acting like there aren't serves nobody (except perhaps Republicans).

[-] olivebranch@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Trump is a democrat funded candidate in republican party. They both work for the same people and same interests.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

You're an idiot

[-] x0x7@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

It needs an electoral system that makes third parties viable.

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

You know it's bad when "BuT hE hAsN't bEeN cOnViCtEd YeT!" is somehow a defense for supporting this guy.

Like, c'mon that nonsense wouldn't fly pertaining to your daughter's new boyfriend, why the heck would you let it excuse somebody running a crumbling world superpower?!

[-] Snowpix@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

You've now been made a moderator of Lemmy's conservative community. That's exactly what they spout constantly...

this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
627 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18909 readers
3196 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS