99
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 21 points 8 months ago

Freedom of speech and the right to protest are when you get arrested for shouting at the person responsible for the death of your son.

[-] athos77@kbin.social 39 points 8 months ago

Did you even read the article you posted?

“Our officers warned him to stop and when he did not, the man was removed from the House Galleries,” USCP said in a statement. He was arrested for crowding, obstructing or incommoding, said USCP, which added that “disrupting the Congress and demonstrating in the Congressional Buildings is illegal.”

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 16 points 8 months ago

Protesting your primary legislative body? Illegal.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

Correct. During an official session.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago

D.C. Code § 22–1307 - Crowding, Obstructing, or Incommoding. Disrupting the Congress and demonstrating in the Congressional Buildings is illegal.”

https://floridianpress.com/2024/03/gold-star-father-arrested-at-bidens-sotu-address/

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Protesting your primary legislative body? Illegal.

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 29 points 8 months ago

You can protest all you want outside. Someone would get kicked out of a school board meeting for this. Free speech means the government can't arrest you for the content of what you say or restrict political assembly.

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Congress shall make no law [...] abridging the freedom [...] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

It is legal to peaceably petition the government for a redress of grievances.
It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional buildings.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 18 points 8 months ago

Yet another moronic comment from you. Having the right to petition the government does not mean you can disrupt official proceedings and refuse to leave when ordered to by the police. It's the content of speech that's protected, you can't go to jail for saying Biden sucks...you can go to jail for disrupting official proceedings and trespassing. You're pretending the right to free speech gives one the right to conduct that speech however they want, and that is again...an incredibly stupid thing to suggest.

[-] oxjox@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

How bizarre is it that people simply choose to misinterpret plain English?

One law says you can peacefully petition, the other says you can not be disruptive and obstructive.

This should not be something anyone finds arguable.

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Good job, but our rights don’t include standing up and screaming during official proceedings. It’s more that the government can’t arrest him for writing an op-ed or Twitter feed criticizing Biden.

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

I don't think you understand what the first amendment actually claims

[-] yngmnwntr@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago

I dont think you do lol

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

It does not guarantee the right to disrupt official proceedings, sorry. Like I said, go try that in a court. Walk in and start protesting about a political issue and claim you're allowed to under the 1st amendment. This isn't exactly the first time someone has tried that btw.

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 20 points 8 months ago

Try going in a courthouse and yelling at someone during a hearing.

Hell, try going in a Post Office and yelling at someone.

[-] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago

The Post Office is not a political body

[-] horsey@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

I used that example because they are also federal property as opposed to private property. It seems you missed the point, though. Free speech doesn’t mean you can create a public disturbance.

[-] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 19 points 8 months ago
[-] horsey@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The entire story and event are Republican media stunts. Yes, the guy lost his son and is upset. But blaming Biden for it (like OP did - "his fault") is about like what they did with Clinton and Benghazi. Strangely it comes up often on Lemmy, "I'm so leftist that I repeat and amplify exactly what Republicans say!"

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 15 points 8 months ago

Nah, his son was responsible for his own death. I won't say he deserved to die but I will say I dgaf about dead marines.

[-] halferect@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

Biden is responsible for a lot of things but this is not one of them.

this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

World News

32321 readers
581 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS