560
submitted 6 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

To use political jargon, Nikki Haley—who has lost primary contests in Iowa, New Hampshire, Nevada, and her home state of South Carolina—does not have a snow ball’s chance in hell of winning the GOP nomination for president. Still, she is apparently intent on not going down without a fight, and to that end, the former governor has a message for voters: Anyone who votes for Donald Trump has a death wish for America.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

I’m a conservative moderate independent

So you and people like you turned 1 of our 2 political parties into a giant dumpster fire that threatens world wide stability...

And now you want to lecture Dems on what kind of candidates we should be happy with?

Why would anyone care what your opinion is on political candidates?

Go fix your own house first instead of burning down half of the only remaining house.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

Thanks for displaying what it looks like when one is siloed-off and can no longer muster the good faith required for a simple conversation across ideological lines.

Why would anyone care what your opinion is

Ironic.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

good faith? HAhahahahahaha Man, the early 90's called, laughed and hung up. Newt Gingrich much?

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Yes, good faith.
You know, the thing you lack when skipping over the substance of a person's argument, even while rushing to equate them with Newt Gingrich.

That's some fine petard hoisting.

[-] icydefiance@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

American conservatives haven't done or said a single thing in good faith in the last half a century. You don't get to ask others to do what you're unwilling to do.

[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 6 months ago

Such a sweeping statement is useless on its face. An educated look at an exit pool from within the last week leaves this analysis in tatters.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 months ago

I’m not a Republican or a Democrat. I just firmly believe in government working for the people. I don’t play party politics.

You have to realize that at the end of the day, we’re all people and that treating people like individuals is better than treating government like a competitive sport.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The "big tent" is just an excuse to move the democratic party right so no matter who wins the billionaires never lose...

That's why the party fights any movement to the left, and takes every opportunity to move right.

I'm sorry you can't understand that, but as a "conservative moderate" I'm sure this isn't a new experience.

Have a nice life

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago

I’m not trying to be a Democrat. And I also don’t believe democrats should move right. That’s something Obama did wrong.

If the middle is 0, one side should be -5 and the other side should be +5. Obama had too much faith in republicans, offering 0 right off the bat, allowing republicans to go to +10.

What should really happen is that the Republican Party should be split into far right crazies and center right, and the Democratic Party should be split into center left and far left.

It is absolutely ridiculous for the Republican Party to characterize the Democrats as “the far left” and throw terms like “communist” and “socialist”. The US NEEDS a socialist and communist party such that the Republican Party can stop mis-using these terms and come back to reality.

I’m sorry if you think I misunderstood, and I welcome any corrections

[-] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago

TL;DR: you're a reasonable person, but one who has no understanding of the game theory of how our political system works.

Here's the thing: you can't just want the Overton window to not be skewed and for all ideologies to be represented by political parties; you have to understand the current fucked-up framework we have that structurally suppresses all but the two most popular parties in order to figure out how to change it to be fairer.

The only alternatives to developing that understanding and strategy -- sitting around whining about it, or trying to burn it down and start over -- range from ineffective to foolhardy.

[-] hddsx@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 months ago

TIL that there’s a term for the concept I’ve been trying to explain what’s wrong with American politics.

By framework, do you mean FPTP naturally becomes a two party system? Because honestly, we need RCV. And it might be prudent to go back to the system at founding:

Most votes is President, second most is vice.

To be honest, I’m not sure why we have to vote for a ticket.

this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
560 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2698 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS