101
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/europe@feddit.de
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sylveon 65 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

How about actually tackling inequality instead of trying to hide it?

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Education is, unironically, the best tool to combat inequality, but the effect only kicks in after the students have finished school.

In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying. What else do you want them to do? They don't have a magic wand, nor do they have magic money to hand out to struggling parents.

Edit: unironically some of the dumbest takes I've ever read on the internet in this thread.

[-] Redditquaza@feddit.de 32 points 10 months ago

In the meantime, uniforms cut down on bullying.

Do they? I don't think so, people are just gonna get bullied with different "reasons", it's not really about the clothes after all.

[-] Fleppensteijn@feddit.nl 16 points 10 months ago

I never saw someone got bullied for their clothes in my environment.

But kids got bullied for wearing glasses, let's hope they ban those then. Also, better to not let kids with weird accents in school. Wouldn't want to provoke the bullies.

[-] Sodis@feddit.de 6 points 10 months ago

So you got rid of one reason to bully, so bullies shifted to other stuff. How does this help now? Are there some studies, that prove school uniforms lead to quantitative less bullying? If yes, I would be interested in that.

[-] Cuntessera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

It’s called sarcasm, babes

[-] onion@feddit.de 29 points 10 months ago

uniforms cut down on bullying

[citation needed]

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
[-] germanatlas 6 points 10 months ago

In addition to the ambivalence of wearers’ feelings, there are mixed data on the impact of uniform on bullying.

Doesn’t sound like concrete evidence to me

[-] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago

If someone changed their mind after reading a single study, you could get them to believe anything.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That's because you're cherry picking.

"The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health."

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

That's because you're cherry picking.

"The literature identified indicates that uniforms have no direct impact on academic performance, yet directly impact physical and psychological health."

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

And yet most people on Lemmy base their beliefs on a single online article

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 1 points 10 months ago

The study literally disproves the guy lol...

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago
[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Wrong in this case where the statement was "it's proven" the disprove of the statement is that its not proven or disproven because of mixed data. Learn to read. Or stop arguing a lost point...

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Your feelings don't qualify as disproof, chum.

Look up the evidence yourself. No need to show the world how bitter you are that a teacher once gave you a detention for being insufferable.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 1 points 9 months ago

What's your point? Cant win logically so we go adhominem... wow.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You've presented nothing that disproves my point, and no evidence to prove yours.

So yeah, you can either do so or get ad hominems at this point.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 1 points 9 months ago

Are you mentally challenged? Your own source says that there is no scientific evidence that what you say is true.

You can't just claim something, provide a source that says there is no credible data and think someone is wrong because you have a source that speaks against your claim "its scientific consens"

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Literally posted proof.

At this point you're just yelling at yourself and hoping that everyone else gets angry.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 1 points 9 months ago

You literally posted disprove.

You are angry and you can go cope somewhere else.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago
[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 10 months ago

That's not even true. Children can differentiate between the cheap and expensive uniforms

[-] Rubanski@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago

Aren't they provided by the school? Or can you have a super high class tailor make you a uniform? I have no idea about school uniforms.

[-] NoLifeKing@ani.social 4 points 10 months ago

No you need to buy them yourself of course.

[-] scrooge101@lemmy.ml 13 points 10 months ago

There is enough magic money to distribute if France (and every other country) would tax the rich.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Maybe instead of throwing money for uniforms it could be used to hire teachers, repair the building, or buy furnitures? Just a couple of ideas you know...

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're missing the point. None of those things would help poor kids not appear poor and get bullied.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Uniform doesn't help for this either.

[-] Gold_E_Lox 9 points 10 months ago

makes the poor kids look the same

[-] Cuntessera@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

In what way? Poor children wouldn’t afford the same attire as rich people, no matter with or without uniform. You can still have more expensive and therefore bully those that don’t have the expensive ones. You can still bully a kid for having a cheap Android phone and not the latest Big McChicken Pro Max™ iPhone; you get the gist.

Uniforms just hide the issues of classism and never deal with them directly or even attempt to solve them at all.

[-] Gold_E_Lox 1 points 10 months ago

i know? thats why i said it makes them Look the same. in my country we only have one set of uniform, not multiple.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Do the whole pay for the uniforms? Here in Australia parents do, and it's ridiculously expensive.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

There's no good option for it : either the parents pay for the uniform and it's a tax fir the poors, or the government pay for it and the money would be far better spent on teachers and stuff.

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

What about no uniforms and no one pays for price gouged, single source clothes?

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Ridiculously expensive? I'm in Australia too, how much do you think they cost?

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Primary is affordable cause you just go into bigw

Secondary, the blazer alone is like $400 and there's only one store where you can get it. Eventually he'll lose it and we'll have a big discussion about money.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

There is no state school that requires a $400 blazer

[-] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Mate, welcome to port Melbourne college. I may be off with the exact number on the blazer but a basic set of uniform with 3 shirts, pants an single blazer was close to 1k . Nitpick as much as you want but I have the receipts and they are hurtful.

Add to that a laptop, because port Melbourne primary used iPad but nooo, not enough for college.

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Literally half the price you claimed.

1000001219

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Pretty sure they do those things already. No mention of those things being lacking in the article.

Amazing that some random guy on the internet thinks he knows better than an accredited and experienced headmaster.

[-] bouh@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You must not be aware of the situation in France...

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 4 points 10 months ago

What else do you want them to do?

How about working with troubled kids to address the underlying issues?

[-] z00s@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You think schools don't have councillors? What do you think these "underlying issues" that contribute to inequality are?

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 3 points 10 months ago

You think schools don’t have councillors?

Oh some do, but it's certainly something which could use a lot more funds. That would definitely be much better at tackling bullying than school uniforms.

What do you think these “underlying issues” that contribute to inequality are?

I was talking about the "underlying issues" of bullies.

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I've noticed that people on Lemmy aren't happy with incremental change for the better. It always has to be a magic solution that solves everything. It's pretty silly but also understandable considering the demographics of Lemmy.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 5 points 10 months ago

Nah they like fancy clothes better, they know it will work. In the meantime, they will also cut 8000 jobs from education too.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
101 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

8332 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS