402
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 12 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They know that, right?

They're mostly the tiktok generation who can barely read. Critical and logical thinking are pipe dreams.

Gonna be a hard life for them.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Democrats should not be supporting genocide, nor dismissing and alienating those that oppose it.

[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Democrats should not be supporting genocide

Good thing they don't then isn't it?

Saying there is one doesn't make it true.

There is a war, it's brutal and will get worse before it gets better. If it gets better.

[-] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago

Palestine doesn't even have an army. What war are you talking about?

This is more a "special military operation" as retaliation for a terrorist attack. Because this ain't a war, it's a massacre of mostly innocent people. I mean.. they're literally targeting children. And the ambulance trying to reach them.

[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

Palestine doesn't even have an army.

It just happened to have 24 battalions of Hamas terroists I guess eh?

Good news is 18 of them have been eliminated. Won't be long now until the objective is complete.

[-] mmcintyre@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

Ok, if they were confining that to Hamas maybe it would be good news. But how many Palestinians were "eliminated" on the way to delivering you your "good news". How many dead children? How many doctors, teachers, drivers, grandparents have been eliminated to bring you this good news?

I just don't think that Israeli lives are any more or less important than Palestinian lives. So murdering 30,000 Gazans doesn't seem like remotely good news to me.

But then again I'm not a bloodthirsty bigot.

[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But how many Palestinians were "eliminated" on the way to delivering

Thousands of people died in the allied Dresden bombing campaign in WW2, by design.

Hundreds of thousands died in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Doesn't make the allies any less just in their fight. They did what was needed to win decisively.

Wars not pretty but often it's necessary if you want to live.

I just don't think that Israeli lives are any more or less important than Palestinian lives.

Sounds like complete pacifism. Is that correct? Is there a war now or at some point in history that you supported?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Good thing they don’t then isn’t it?

It would be a good thing if they weren't gaslighting genocide deniers as well, but here you are.

Saying there is one doesn’t make it true.

Denying it doesn't make it anything other than genocide. You just want to support genocide without pushback.

There is a war, it’s brutal and will get worse before it gets better. If it gets better.

It's genocide and nothing else. Downplaying it is genocide apologia.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Did you look at the picture of the protesters? You think those people are GenZ?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Centrist Democrats can't justify their support for genocide because there is no justification for supporting genocide. But since they don't want to stop, we get the Greatest Hits of Centrist Dismissals.

[-] swearengen@sopuli.xyz 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Small sample size. I look at the polling data. Those claiming there's a genocide skew young in every poll.

[-] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Good. You didn't answer my question. My guess is you're a Boomer who thinks everyone younger than 65 is a child.

this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2024
402 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19136 readers
3262 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS