58
King Charles to receive huge pay rise from UK taxpayers
(www.theguardian.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
58 points (100.0% liked)
UK Politics
3084 readers
26 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Allowed to keep more money which is derived from his ancestors theft. Accurate headline.
You'd find if you traced even the money you had, you'd owe it in some way to some atrocity done somewhere down the line. Even our modern products are built off of the labour of underpaid asians.
And a rowboat and a supertanker both displace water.
There is a difference between working income and investment income.
Investment income is directly attributable to the investment and the past actions that have wealth in the first place.
Working income is not, you might ask who's paying you and where they got that money. But you have worked and added value in a way that generates income tied to your work.
Most people do not have generational wealth. Their money is traceable to their work. In some cases their parents work. Occasionally a grandparents work.
It's possible that your work is extracting value you shouldn't be entitled to extract, but it's usually well removed from the real problem.
The royal family's investments go well back well beyond any of them did any work.
You're right that the further back you go, the more likely it is you'll find an atrocity. This is quite common with talk about reparations for slavery and racism in the US and UK.
For the duchy of Cornwall as an example we're talking about untaxed wealth since 1337. On land stolen from Cornish people. After the earldom was essentially taken by force in 1068.
By the current owner's 25x great grandfather on his mother's side and 31x great grandfather through the direct royal line. (Prince William)
A subjugated population living in surfdom. As voting rights were tied to property they didn't get a vote until 1918.
The Representation of the People Act extended the vote to all men over 21 and most women over 30
Then 1928 women got the equal right to vote. All men and women over 21.
The royal estates are the 3rd largest land owners in the UK. Behind only the forestry commission and the ministry of defence. About 3% of the land is owned by royal or those descended from nobility.
Then there's the large amount of land in the hands of the church and private schools which has been to directly influence the rich few. There's the enormous wealth gained from selling land on for mineral and resource extraction.
But sure after almost a century of something resembling democracy you're going to pretend someone earning a paycheck is the same as someone benefitting from a near millennia of wealth extraction under the threat of force.
And that's just talking about land in the UK. The amount of assets they've gained from empire is another thing to talk about.
Fair point.