258
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
258 points (100.0% liked)
News
23267 readers
2668 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It always pisses me off when I see qualifications like this. You know who needs forgiveness? People who got suckered into a lot of fucking debt. You know who needs forgiveness? People who have missed a lot of fucking payments.
Qualifications like this seem designed to make sure relief goes directly to those who need it least every time.
The More sweeping forgiveness attempt was blocked.
He seems pretty committed to forgiving whatever he can get through. It wouldn't be unusual to give up after the initial attempt was blocked, but now he seems to be breaking it apart into more manageable chunks. I'm still slightly hopeful that more forgiveness is coming for those who need it.
The record really doesn't support that. He could have kept pursuing the sweeping relief under different rationales while also doing these small-scale things, and he could have done more to make sweeping relief more difficult to challenge in court by implementing it closer to when it was announced. The fact that there have been no efforts in that direction makes it seem a lot more likely they're just trying to get as many headlines out of this issue for themselves as they can and don't care who does and doesn't get help at the end of the day.
e; almost goes without saying, but I probably should add that this is still way better than anything we'd see out of any Republican administration
This sounds really ambiguous. What "different rationales" are you referring to? I'm pretty sure his team of lawyers and advisors have pursued every alternative avenue possible. Warren's recent interview with PSA reflects this. If he wanted to provide blanket coverage before, why wouldn't he try now when it's such an obvious win to rally support from an essential coalition?
Thanks for giving a specific example. I'm curious why they didn't pursue that route or if they just didn't believe the DoE actually held that authority. At the end of the day, the DoE is still a cabinet-level Department formed under the executive, so I'd assume the thought-process was that the emergency powers under COVID superseded the powers of the DoE?
The Biden admin tried a different approach that included more borrowers, but the Trump SCOTUS and Republicans are doing everything in their power to derail that. They succeeded so far.
It's simply more cost effective this way. He gets more people out of debt for the same value of money.
In other words form an illusion he’s helping without actually having to help.
Yes technically he’s helping but he’s helping the people that need help the least. It’s like handing out stimulus checks to people who are already cash rich.
In the end it’s just a big publicity stunt to secure votes. This isn’t what real help looks like.
If the people are indepted then they're clearly not rich, just because they don't have as much of a dept as some other people. And yes, of course it is to secure votes. Welcome to politics 101. The same reason why no country on Earth actually does any meaningful shit against climate change. Because no one would vote for you once they realize what that would actually entail.
I mean....maybe I am misunderstansing something... but if they have a small loan of 12k....and in 10 years they haven't been able to repay it yet... to me it seems like they needed help....