179
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago

It's common courtesy to post the plain text of a paywalled article.

[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We've started asking users not to do this. No issues with posting an archive link, though.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Why in the world would you ask people to stop cercomventing a pay wall

[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

There's no need to be rude.

I'm not asking people not to circumvent paywalls. In fact, if you reread my comment, I recommended the user leave an archive link, which is a method of bypassing paywalls that doesn't involve posting the full contents of the article to this site.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Probably because it could raise copyright issues for Beehaw since Beehaw would be hosting the article.

[-] CooperRedArmyDog@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

At some point we have to ask oursevles what is more important IP law, or dessiminating information.

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 year ago

Lemmy was founded on the idea that different instances can decide questions like this for themselves.

It seems that Beehaw has chosen one direction, but there may be other instances out there that have chosen another direction.

[-] Zworf@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately there's another problem with archive.is / archive.ph / archive.today . Their owner has some beef with Cloudflare DNS and returns bogus results to them so anyone using 1.1.1.1 as DNS can't visit them.

The Cloudflare side of the story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19828702 The archive side: https://twitter.com/archiveis/status/1018691421182791680

Note that that discussion was from 2019 but the situation was never resolved and the issue persists to this day.

[-] TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for pointing this out, I wasn't aware.

[-] SpectralPineapple@beehaw.org 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Copy pasting entire articles is discouraged. It is preferable to share a link to an archive website such as this: https://archive.is/5UPAI

[-] RoboRay@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Common courtesy is to not even link to paywalled articles... The publisher has already made it clear they are not interested in public awareness of their content.

[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago

I hate paywalls as much as the next guy but when I think about it from the publisher's protective I really don't see a way to be sustainable in this environment without a paywall. I'm sure the writers mostly want their articles read but they also want (and deserve) to be paid for their work. How do you do that if, like you imply, the content needs to be completely free for everyone to access? And I'll bet you use adblock too (I sure do) making it even more impossible.

I don't know how this shit works but the way you frame it isn't it.

[-] Zworf@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yet these companies do allow Google et al to index their stuff, otherwise the paywall bypass addons, archive.ph etc wouldn't work. They want their cake and eat it. It's super annoying to find something on Google and then be hit with a paywall. Totally bait and switch.

If there weren't such great paywall-bypassing plugins I'd want a plugin that removes paywall sites from Google results, Lemmy submissions etc.

Also you really can't expect a user to subscribe to a full subscription to read a handful articles a month.

At least offer a once off small payment but almost nobody does that.

And I'll bet you use adblock too (I sure do) making it even more impossible.

Yes though the tracking is the most important reason there. If they just used untargeted ads it wouldn't be such a problem.

[-] dan@upvote.au 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wired doesn't show a paywall for me for some reason, but in any case the the original source is Ars Technica which I don't think shows a paywall to anyone: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/02/air-canada-must-honor-refund-policy-invented-by-airlines-chatbot/

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Not paywalled for me perhaps it wasn't for OP.

this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2024
179 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39806 readers
136 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS