353
submitted 1 year ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

If he were interested in bringing things to light he would have released all the information he had, but he didn't, he held back for US Conservatives. He did right-wing politics in the US a big favor.

He has an agenda, and it's not press freedom.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 2 points 1 year ago

>If he were interested in bringing things to light he would have released all the information he had, but he didn’t, he held back for US Conservatives. He did right-wing politics in the US a big favor.

what makes you think he had something to release?

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He leaked information from the DNC, but never released the same email logs for the RNC. He was given both following a known hack of both the DNC and the RNC. He released 1 side, and then tried promote the conspiracy about Seth Richs death.

He has an agenda. Wikileaks is a good idea, but I don’t buy that it didn't have a state backer.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 1 year ago

what makes you think he was given the rnc information?

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Because we know for a fact the information was taken from both as part of the same breach of the RNC and DNC servers by Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, Russian state actors.

If Assange was not aware of the additional information from the breach that's just as bad, because he's happy to be a useful idiot with a fanbase.

So he's either malicious or stupid. Neither is worthy of admiration.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 1 year ago

this does not entail that they handad that information to assange.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 1 points 1 year ago

there is a possibility that nothing from the rnc was that damning (i doubt this), or he felt that releasing it would dilute the seriousness of both sets of accusations.

but this is assuming he had access to the rnc hack, and that is not proven.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

THERE IT IS. The acceptable conspiracy theory of the left. Thanks

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It's acceptable because it's true. I would respect him greatly if he had released everything rather than what was damaging to his personal political enemies.

this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
353 points (100.0% liked)

News

25065 readers
3110 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS