975

Pope Francis: I don’t bless a ‘homosexual marriage.’ I bless two people who love each other. (www.americamagazine.org)

submitted 9 months ago by Stamau123@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

191 comments fedilink hide all child comments

VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- People who act shocked that a priest would bless a gay couple but have no problem with him blessing a crooked businessman are hypocrites, Pope Francis said.

“The most serious sins are those that are disguised with a more ‘angelic’ appearance. No one is scandalized if I give a blessing to an entrepreneur who perhaps exploits people, which is a very serious sin. Whereas they are scandalized if I give it to a homosexual -- this is hypocrisy,” he told the Italian magazine Credere.

The interview was scheduled for publication Feb. 8, but Vatican News reported on some of its content the day before when the magazine issued a press release about the interview.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Matriks404@lemmy.world 53 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I am an (agnostic) atheist, but let's be clear: not all priests are pedophiles, this is a huge exaggeration. But I still think they should be able to marry and have children, like normal people. And I believe that this would at least stop some of them doing pedophilic acts.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 46 points 9 months ago

Pedos are going to pedo, but if you only recruit from an audience of people that are actively trying to avoid romantic adult relationships, I imagine going to have a higher percentage of pedos in that group.

By allowing priests to marry, be LGBTQ+, etc, you’re going to have fewer open seats at the alter for pedos.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 9 months ago

I would even challenge that pedos are going to pedo. Obviously there's no research on this, but are pedos only attracted to children? Are all pedophiles also rapists? I find that hard to believe. I think that "child molesting priests" are an intersection of priest, pedophile, rapist, and sexually frustrated.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

If the wikipedia page is accurate: some pedophiles are only attracted to children ("exclusive pedophiles), but some are also attracted to adults; and not all pedophiles commit rape.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 9 months ago

I mean, to me this is just common sense.

[-] Kase@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

My bad, thought you were genuinely asking

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

No, not all pedophile are rapist but almost all consume materials that were produced by raping children. One problem is that there are only a few programs that actually targeting helping pedophiles to deal with their condition. So we leave them on their own to figure out how to deal with their condition.

[-] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 9 months ago

Big [ citation needed ] there that triggers my BS sensors. CP is a huge problem but it's literally impossible to know if "most consume materials" like that. Not defending pedophiles in any form, but hate bad logic.

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That was my impression - might be wrong. I will check up on it.

EDIT:

Seems also inconclusive, since it's a difficult topic to research:

"In summary, child and/or adult pornography is a feature in the lives of many pedophiles and other sex offenders, just as it is a feature in the lives of some persons who do not commit sexual offences. Alternatively, some sex offenders do not use pornography of any kind. "

https://publications.gc.ca/site/archivee-archived.html?url=https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2007/jus/J3-2-2000-5E.pdf

Maybe there is newer research you are aware of.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

but almost all consume materials that were produced by raping children.

So what's your take on lolicon?

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Depends on if it's more a substitute or a trigger. I personally don't know of any conclusive research on this topic. But people consuming lolicon defenetly need psychological help, don't think it's a healthy fantasy no matter how to look on it.

[-] Rodeo@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

So still bad?

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 1 points 9 months ago

Troubles reading?

[-] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago

It would also help if church would actually punish (by assisting police investigation) and kick out offenders instead of covering up and moving them around.

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

But Lemmy only deals in extremes. Like AcAB

[-] reagansrottencorpse@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

That's a bad example since it's true

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

So then All Firemen Are Drunks?

Because that’s true too.

this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2024

975 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers

2635 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.