this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)
3DPrinting
15306 readers
131 users here now
3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.
The r/functionalprint community is now located at:
!functionalprint@kbin.social
or !functionalprint@fedia.io
There are CAD communities available at:
!cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml
Rules
-
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia. Code of Conduct.
-
Be respectful, especially when disagreeing. Everyone should feel welcome here.
-
No porn (NSFW prints are acceptable but must be marked NSFW)
-
No Ads / Spamming / Guerrilla Marketing
-
Do not create links to reddit
-
If you see an issue please flag it
-
No guns
-
No injury gore posts
If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is 
Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Can't you make the infill concentric? That should help.
Isn't that possible only for top/bottom layer?
Set top and bottom solid layers to 1. Set infill to concentric and then set infill percentage to 100%.
It should get rid of most triangles.
Unfortunately that has the same issue as well. These triangles are due to the 3 closest perimeter lines meeting, thus concentric ends up with the same issue.
Then I am afraid you can't eliminate all triangles. If you had an extruder with variable extrusion width, then it might have worked. Why are you trying to eliminate the triangles anyway?
Yellow is perimeter lines, the goal is to not use infill at all, and to just use multiple perimeter passes.
Why?
Direction specific force loading. In this particular instance, Having it run the infill along the perimeter of the part would improve it.