991
Life goals (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] passntrash@midwest.social 158 points 9 months ago

While I doubt this actually happened, I'm still disturbed by everyone cheering it on absent any context that would make OP not look like a petulant child.

Quitting without notice doesn't require justification, fuck the bosses, whatever.

But for all we know, this manager had bent over backwards to stand up for their employees, or cover for them. Maybe this employee took advantage of that and was miserable to his coworkers. Those are just as likely as anything else, given that no further information was provided.

At least invent a backstory how this manager was dogshit or abusive, or the company was awful. Make us want to believe that you're not just someone with a persecution complex who's quick to anger and lash out.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 41 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd be more inclined to see your point, except that the manager in question said "each job requires 2 weeks notice" like he was indignant that he didn't get something he deserved.

That's not only not true at all, it's active manipulation on their part in a hail Mary attempt to have their work covered for enough time to look for another employee.

It may be unprofessional to quit without notice, but it's really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks' notice, particularly in a place that might also allow the employer to fire someone for any reason at any time with no notice.

[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 15 points 9 months ago

it's really unprofessional to present the act of quitting as requiring 2 weeks' notice

If it's part of the contract then it's not unprofessional at all to bring up the terms that you've agreed on. My job requires a month's notice and it wouldn't be unprofessional for my employer to bring that up if I tried to quit on the spot.

That being said, I don't live in a place with "at-will employment", which is a fucking travesty and should never have been allowed in the first place.

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 16 points 9 months ago

I'm not from the US but I always assumed "at-will employment" works both ways. You're telling me it doesn't?

[-] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

It's not typically written into the contract for most jobs I've seen, but it's still considered very unprofessional to leave without giving the company time to find a replacement. It doesn't just mess with the company or your boss; it messes with your coworkers, too, who now have to pick up the slack.

Basically, while it's not written into your contract, it's still considered socially unacceptable not to give a two week notice barring any unusual circumstances.

[-] techt@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

It's not unprofessional at all; at worst, it's discourteous, because notice of departure has zero to do with your professional conduct, it's a courtesy. You can professionally quit on the spot, look:

"Due to a change of personal circumstances, I will be resigning immediately, effective at the end of the day. I will work with you to make this transition as smooth as possible within that timeframe, but it is not negotiable."

[-] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I think I accidentally confused the two words. You're right.

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 3 points 9 months ago

That quote you posted would actually be fine, so you're right.

I think discourteous and unprofessional is a difference without distinction here though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Syndic@feddit.de 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Na my dude, as long it's not considered at least as unprofessional for companies to let people on the spot they can go an fuck them self.

Want a mandated notice period? Put it in contract for both parties. That's how it works in countries with sane worker laws.

[-] Rev3rze@feddit.nl 3 points 9 months ago

It's always been in my contracts, a month's notice is the norm here. I've never broken that but I've also been fortunate enough to work at places where work and life are balanced. I wouldn't have wanted to disrupt the work for my colleagues and my managers have always shown their respect for me to the point that I want to work with them instead of against them. I don't think I'll ever work for an employer that puts the company over the wellbeing of their employees. I've seen what being a real team means. People cooperate freely and go the extra mile for eachother if necessary and cut massive amounts of slack to anybody in the team that's having a tough time and needs to focus on their life outside of work for a bit.

That said I won't ever get any bonuses or make large amounts of money in my career either but that's not what I'm after if it would mean putting work before life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Pelicanen@sopuli.xyz 2 points 9 months ago

I'll be honest, I've never lived in a place that has at-will employment so I don't know the details, but I'd also assume that it works both ways.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

If you doubt this actually happened clearly you've never worked in customer service/ food service

[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago

I’ve spent my life in customer service/retail sales/food service and I doubt this actually happened.

[-] yokonzo@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

All 2 years of it I see, my man you gotta open your eyes then. The amount of pettiness in that industry is insane. Your ignorance of it doesn't mean it doesn't exist

[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago

My man… just because you’ve seen it doesn’t mean everyone else has or that it’s common. Maybe you’ve just worked a shitty places. But that doesn’t mean it’s industry standard.

[-] WalrusDragonOnABike@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

At least in the US, it seems pretty standard. Never worked retail myself, but everyone I know has hated it. Certainly a lot would like to imagine doing this kind of thing (but few actually would).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] passntrash@midwest.social 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How many Lemmy users do you think have never worked retail customer facing jobs, or food service? I'm betting it's a minority, but I could be wrong.

Either way, whatever internal compass you use to determine another user's job history needs some tuning because I've worked in plenty of service industry jobs.

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Y'all are pretty tech savvy around here. I wouldn't be surprised at all to find out that the majority of Lemmy users skipped the retail/CS/hospitality jobs in favor of entry level IT/ tech jobs.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Entry level IT is tech support, which is customer service, but with dumber than average customers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 19 points 9 months ago

I'd say the reply from the boss is enough to justify that response. The boss is chiding him for not putting in a 2 weeks notice, calling him unprofessional. From this one interaction you can make a pretty good assumption as to the quality of the boss. The only proper response to someone quitting is either a counter offer or a farewell, not a guilt trip.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 39 points 9 months ago

Not really... It is unprofessional. That doesn't mean it's necessarily wrong, just that it's not always unreasonable for a manager to point that out. Again, we lack any other context for the situation.

I would add, that he also followed it up with a good luck and didn't drag it out. So, based off what limited evidence we have available, he seems like the more reasonable person in this situation.

Have you never had a good manager and a bad coworker?

[-] optissima@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Sorry, how is it unprofessional? Who set that standard? What is it there for?

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Not really… It is unprofessional.

When companies firing people for base reasons, i.e. reaching quarterly targets, is also universally seen as unprofessional and shunned as such, we can talk again. Until then, they deserve exactly as much courtesy as they are willing to give.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 6 points 9 months ago

When we hang all the bosses, will that include the POC Arby's assistant manager? How about the call center team lead?

[-] Syndic@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

That's some pretty wild stuff you have to make up just because you have no good response. That's not even a straw man but a straw giant space monster. Sheesh dude ...

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 32 points 9 months ago

It is unprofessional though. And that boss was not really being a dick.

Now this person has to go call the staff to find someone to fill shifts last minute, which everyone hates.

Unless your relationship with your boss is absolutely awful, it's not hard to give notice.

The "you're lucky you even got a text" really looks like the employee is toxic.

[-] StereoTrespasser@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago

A good rule of thumb is to never, ever burn bridges with past managers. Keep your dignity and remain professional. You never know when you'll need them as a reference.

[-] EmergMemeHologram@startrek.website 6 points 9 months ago

Yes, and references are not the same as employment checks.

All the jobs I've applied to have had a reference check. I've been a reference.

It is very valuable to have a former boss say "oh, X, I liked them, they were professional and good at XYZ".

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

In the US, that's straight up illegal unless they write you a reference separately. When the hiring company calls they can only give the legal answers.

Also, you could just write that letter yourself and have a friend be your ex boss. The rules are meaningless and the points are made up.

[-] drphungky@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It is not illegal to call and talk about you with a reference that you gave them - that's the whole point of a reference. Separately, yes, calling a former boss may only get the prospective employer answers like "they worked here and are eligible for rehire", but that's usually a human resources policy to avoid a costly, but ultimately winnable if you only tell the truth, lawsuit. It's not illegal for a former boss to shit on you if you were shitty, and it happens all the time at smaller firms, in small industries, or small towns.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

A former manager of mine has been trying to convince me to return anytime she sees me since I left almost 2 years ago, offering me better pay and a position much higher on the foodchain. She also respects why I left (I had bigger ambitions that they couldn't meet at the time) and respects my reason that I haven't taken her up on that offer (that place only has really garbage benefits)

One of my wife's friends babysits for the director of IT at a large company 2 hours away and apparently I can get an interview with them if I just say the word.

Being professional and staying on good terms is not just for the employer, but it can also be a safety net to fall back on if things go sideways. Being able to reach out to contacts and say "Hey, I'm unexpectedly looking for a job now, do you have any openings?" is a very good place to be, plus sharing openings with former colleagues is a good way to help eachother out.

[-] meat_popsicle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago

Fuckin managers will fire you with 0 notice, but that’s life and “at will employment”. You fire the business and you have to give 2 weeks because business run “lean” and “at will” is only supposed to be used by the business.

Well, there’s risk and reward in business, and more risk in running lean. Managers can always structure their departments to not be impacted by an inopportune departure. After all, people can get hit by a bus leaving their house in the morning.

Hell, if an employee is that critical, maybe they should be put under an employment contract with set terms and compensation agreement. You know, like most directors have.

But we all know these things will never happen.

[-] passntrash@midwest.social 11 points 9 months ago

Sir, this was a shift manager at a Wendy's, not a VP at FedEx.

[-] Aatube@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Saying you did something unprofessional is a guilt trip?

[-] GilgameshCatBeard@lemmy.ca 9 points 9 months ago

It is to the kids on lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 10 points 9 months ago

Dunno why you're getting blasted, you're right. What good is chastising the employee at that stage going to do if it isn't meant as a guilt trip? Does anyone really think the manager had his best interest in mind and is trying to look out for his future? Or is it more likely he is trying to keep shifts covered for 2 more weeks so productivity doesn't completely tank? I'd be completely okay with a simple "ok" or thumbs up emoji compared to a lecture.

[-] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 9 points 9 months ago

Pretty much this. The manager, from one text, comes across as a holier than thou, "think of your coworkers!! We're family!!" Kind of person. One text can reveal that much. The "good luck" doesn't come across as sincere, since it follows that whining. Dude wants shifts covered for 2 weeks, he can hire someone else, do it himself , or fix whatever problems (probably money) made the person leave in the first place. Or they're a middle manager and get off on being overly focused on the "rules". Or he's just a low end shift manager, in which case why lick the boot that hard my dude?

[-] cadekat@pawb.social 9 points 9 months ago

I feel like this is absolutely an appropriate response. A really shitty boss would sue or fire them for cause. Chiding them is pretty dang tame.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

You can't (successfully) sue someone for quitting and you can't fire them when they have already quit.

[-] cadekat@pawb.social 3 points 9 months ago

I am obviously not a lawyer, but I'm pretty sure you can sue for breach of contract if it was in the employment contract and it causes actual damages. This random site agrees with me: https://www.mannlawyers.com/resources/can-my-employer-sue-me-for-quitting/

You can absolutely fire someone after they quit if notice is in your contract. Employee gives notice, doesn't show up for two weeks, and is fired with cause.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

I have never heard of notice being in a contract. I'm sure it's a thing, but it's very uncommon.

[-] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago

I don't know where you all work. But over here it is standard even for 'unqualified' work to have at least 1 month notice. For both sides. This gives employers and employees some time to find something new.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

I'm speaking for the United States, minus Montana (if I recall correctly).

Neither employers nor employees are required to give notice. However, it is standard practice that employers do not give notice and employees do (usually two weeks).

[-] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Well, that just looks like an unfair system. Both sides need the same mandatory notice.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago

Oh, the vast majority of us agree with you. Yet here we are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

Nah. Fuck em. If they were a decent manager they'd thank them for the notice they did get because they know that many managers punish people for giving notice.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 14 points 9 months ago
  1. It's a meme, all that backstory wouldn't fit
  2. You're saying it's silly to assume/make up the backstory of the employee, yet you dedicated a whole paragraph making up a backstory for the boss
  3. It's a meme my guy, in a community titled Lefty Memes, what do you expect?
[-] passntrash@midwest.social 5 points 9 months ago

Hey, fuck you... just kidding.

TBH I just clicked on this when scrolling All and didn't even notice what community it was until well into my comment taking off with replies.

The conversation evolved, and devolved, from there. Not much to do about it now.

[-] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago

Hey, fuck you too. Just kidding, have a great day

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 6 points 9 months ago

No. The managers speaking on behalf of the company, and the company can fuck itself.

All companies can fuck themselves.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
991 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

4307 readers
682 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS