466
Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 10 months ago by Persona3Reload to c/196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 29 points 10 months ago

Not to be pedantic, but your sentence makes no sense (obviously you're not trying to lol) By a another milk was made

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 31 points 10 months ago

My Spanish isn't the best, but I'm pretty sure that translates to "for another milk was made," which perfectly fits with the LOTR quote they're referencing.

[-] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 40 points 10 months ago

Yeah but for does not translate into por in this context. The only word that works here is pero. There is no literal word for for (as in but) in Spanish and the closest approximation is pero. Source: I am Spanish

[-] FakeGreekGirl 29 points 10 months ago

Thanks for the tip. I'll keep that in mind when I make that joke again (and I'm sure I will).

[-] TheCoolerMia 22 points 10 months ago

You can translate "for" in that sentence to "pues"

Also remove the "un" because else you're saying "an another milk" or if you want to leave it for extra funny points make it "una" because "leche" is femenine

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The only word that works here is pero

Careful with that r button though, as perro would be a downright silly word to use in this context.

[-] AnActOfCreation@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

In the English quote, doesn't "for" really mean "because", not "but"?

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

A Greek and Canadian disagreeing on Spanish makes me feel like my mono and thee quarters linguistic ass needs to try harder.

[-] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago

Not Canadian, contrary to my username. I'm actually Spanish, so I imagine that I'm the one who would be correct considering it's my native language

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Am I supposed to believe you’re not furniture either? Nice try you shifty stack of maple drawers.

Edit: ¿“Por” no es “for” en ingles?

¿Para qué no les dijiste cómo?

[-] Canadian_Cabinet@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago

Por does mean for, but only in specific contexts. Here's a list. It also can mean by, through, because of, and to, to name a few.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Isn’t it strange how languages have tons of homonyms we hardly notice while having synonyms for almost anything else? Thanks for sharing I’ll check that out.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

"Shifty stack of maple drawers" is this best thing I've read all week. Thank you for that.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

You’re welcome thanks yourself

[-] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Prepositions are probably one of the parts of speech that is the hardest to translate in any language.

I learned Swedish as a second language, and it feels like "at", "for", and "on" are completely randomly interchanged, even though each word has a direct translation and both Swedish and English are Germanic languages at their core. There are multiple forms of "to" in Swedish too.

The "usage notes" section for the Swedish word for "On" is an experience lol
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/p%C3%A5#Usage_notes

Luckily, they're also the most forgiving part at any speech of mistranslate.

[-] jopepa@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

It’s no wonder doctors in linguistics dip into philosophy as often as they do, incredible minds to know enough languages to study them. Polyglots are cool

[-] FakeGreekGirl 5 points 10 months ago

That's what I'm going for, but my Spanish kinda stinks (despite three years of high school Spanish, lol)

this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2024
466 points (100.0% liked)

196

16743 readers
1993 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS