288
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 141 points 8 months ago

Mark my words:

Trump will win, and it will be largely because of people who refuse to support Biden due to Palestine.

I will be truly happy if time proves me wrong.

[-] CptEnder@lemmy.world 101 points 8 months ago

We should be criticizing our old, conservative president Biden. He needs to 180 his stance.

Also not voting for him in Nov is vapid and invalidates any defense of the Palestinian people you have.

It sucks, but it's reality.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 64 points 8 months ago

It sucks, but it’s reality.

Yep.

We legitimately have zero options besides voting for Biden.

And I sincerely hope enough voters realize that, because trump will be worse.

The only thing we can do till 2028 is make a lot of noise about how this shit is unacceptable and Dems need to do better

Unfortunately the DNC knows that while we say it's unacceptable, we still have to vote Biden or risk trump.

Which is why the DNC has spent 30 years drifting further and further right. They have captive voters and are willing to risk Republican rule so Dems can be as rightwing as possible.

[-] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

This is honestly the best take on the issue I've seen so far.

I am the first person to say we need to break the two-party stranglehold on politics. We need independent candidates in office yesterday. But this election is the abso-fucking-lutely worst time to make a run at that, because that third party vote WILL be a vote for Trump. And if you firmly believe that third party or independent politicians have a place, elect them to your local city council or school board or state legislature. That is where they will make a real, actionable difference.

A vote against Biden, no matter who for, is a vote for Trump. No amount of TikTok "well ackshually" will change that reality.

[-] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 10 points 8 months ago

>A vote against Biden, no matter who for, is a vote for Trump.

this is election misinformation. a vote for anyone except trump cannot be counted as a vote for trump.

[-] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

The election is a tug of war. Trump and his supporters are pulling on the right. Biden and his supporters are pulling on the left.

When you vote for an independent candidate, you are removing force that could have been used to pull against Trump and redirecting that force towards a candidate who has zero chance of winning. A vote for an independent candidate is a vote for Trump.

The only valid retort to this is "well I wasn't going to vote anyway" and anyone who feels that way can shut the fuck up about everything.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 8 points 8 months ago

They have captive voters and are willing to risk Republican rule so Dems can be as rightwing as possible.

It's simply the logical thing for them to do, in the present state of things.

The far left / moderate left voters are captive for the reason you note. The party is closely aligned with center-left viewpoints, so they have their votes. The far / moderate right voters are all voting republican. It's the swing voters / true centrists / center right voters who are up in the air, so those are the people the dems have to appease. So they drift further and further towards their viewpoints.

Unfortunately we can't fix this situation without a healthy show that they don't have the far left / moderate left votes guaranteed, and need to start paying attention to what we want, too... but we can't do that without accepting a republican president, which we certainly can't do right now. So we're stuck. And it'll just keep happening that way, because as dems drift further left, the republicans are just falling off the right end of the scale, and they keep falling further every year.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

It’s simply the logical thing for them to do, in the present state of things

Except the last time we had a true progressive campaign...

A lot of those 1/3 of voter showed up. And we flipped a bunch of "red states" that the DNC had given up on those.

It's not that those people won't vote, they just won't vote for candidates like Biden and Hillary.

But they turned up for Obama in 08.

We found something that worked, and the DNC's response was to tighten down primaries so there wouldn't be another upset.

Which has progressed to them straight up removing an entire states delegates.

Unfortunately we can’t fix this situation without a healthy show that they don’t have the far left / moderate left votes guaranteed, and need to start paying attention to what we want, to

I disagree.

I think if a moderate loses because they don't get the progressive votes, then nothing will change. They'll say that progressives are unreliable and this means they need to go further right.

Because we have decades of recent history that shows even if they still get the "lesser evil" votes, they'll still say the same thing if they lose.

The only option is primaries, which is why I'm so pissed the DNC just vetoed a state primary by yanking delegates away.

If we don't even have the primaries where the DNC openly say they can ignore results...

We're kind of out of options.

And I legitimately don't know what the path forward is. Or why everyone else isn't shitting bricks right now.

If the DNC doesn't get substantial pushback, they're not going to just give up on this veto they just decided they'll have.

Hell, Republicans will probably keep control of NH's state goverment for the next four years, if they don't agree to the DNCs demands about primary order, will NH Dems not get a say in 2028 either?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Hegar@kbin.social 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yep, I would place the blame on the pro-genocide politicians before the anti-genocide voters.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 17 points 8 months ago

Unfortunately genocide isn't on the ballot so you'll need to base your vote on some other metric.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Then you better start pushing your party to primary him or get someone else in there. His shitty numbers didnt start overnight, theyve seen the writing on the wall and refused to acknowledge it.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Biden's arrogance on this is incredible, though of course he's part of the party establishment so that's to be expected. "You aren't allowed to complain about anything and if we don't win this election it's all your fault" is not, it turns out, a winning campaign slogan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

And then Trump will make things infinitely worse, and we'll have to fight that same stupid battle over who's to blame for the next 4 years. Wash, rinse, repeat.

[-] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Yes indeed, but the people pledging to vote against Biden because Israel don't care. Or don't believe. Or sincerely think Trump will be better.

[-] Shyfer@ttrpg.network 8 points 8 months ago

Or they don't want to vote for a pro genocide President. Tbh, I get it. Your vote is your stamp of approval for a candidate for a lot of people. It's the only way to say their approval that a lot of people have, their only voice.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Yeah, I don't understand hating Biden for something that Netanyahu is doing. And there's only so much Biden could do other than try to play peacekeeper, which he's been doing. Pretty much any other actions require congressional support. Biden isn't a king, he can't unilaterally declare that we're ending all support for Israel.
And yet an insane number of people act like he's over there killing Palestinians with his bare hands.

[-] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 28 points 8 months ago

I know this sounds crazy, but he could not sell them weapons. He is directly supporting what is happening there by doing so.

Call back carrier groups, stop selling weapons, and let them deal with their own fucking problems that they caused

[-] RandomPancake@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

By all means, elect Trump and see if he does any better with human rights.

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

It doesnt get much worse than death. Liberals will justify any and every possible action to defend the blue fascist by claiming the red one could be worse. What happened to 'push him left after the election'

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Not to mention Israel is absolutely the most important ally we have in the middle east. As lovely as it would be to openly shit on them and Saudi Arabia for being inhumane jerks, we just don't have that option. The second we alienate Israel is the second WWIII becomes virtually inevitable. Biden's choosing between shitty options and shittier options, and like it or not, we need foreign allies in strategic locations, especially since Pax Americana is rapidly collapsing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago

You could also argue, if Biden loses it will be because of his uncritical support for Israeli war crimes.

Nobody is forcing Biden to alienate his base.

And, although I personally don't believe Joe is supporting genocide, it's not very realistic to expect people to vote for someone who (in their mind) is supporting genocide.

[-] ZahzenEclipse@kbin.social 22 points 8 months ago

Has biden truly been uncritical? Don't get wrong, I don't think he's done enough but to say he's bene uncritical seems inaccurate.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Increasing funding to Israel, publicly say there is no red line Israel could cross where they wouldnt have US support, bypassing Congress 2 times to transfer weapons is unequivocally supporting genocide.

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

No, if Biden loses, it’s because of foolish Americans who either voted for Trump or threw away their votes. What comes next with Trump is on their heads. You can’t not vote for Biden, then say what happens with Trump isn’t your fault.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[-] HorseRabbit@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 8 months ago

Weird way to assign blame. It's not the Democratic party's fault for having bad policies, it's the public's fault for not supporting the Democrats regardless of their policies. If Biden loses it's because his party made bad decisions.

[-] pjwestin@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

It's just how liberal centrists sheild themselves from self-reflection. They know there are people to their left, and engaging with their ideas might make them realize their policies and candidates cause harm, so they decide to dismiss them out of hand as aiding the right. This creates a safe narrative where they're always the good guy; people to their right are dangerous lunatics, people to their left are naive fools who are unintentionally helping the lunatics, and they're the only ones behaving responsibly. This allows them to condemn people calling for the end of a genocide without engaging with the fact that their candidate is enabling a genocide.

[-] xor@infosec.pub 12 points 8 months ago

i've been watching this freight train loom ever closer and... thank you for seeing it too...
this is the albatross around the neck of biden... and it's killing my soul
i know, in my heart, trump would've done the same thing, and many worse things...
but ffs, why are the liberals completely blind to a blatant genocide?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

I think taking the delegates from NH because moderates keep losing to progressives is a bigger deal that will effect turnout.

Biden's and the DNC's excuse that the state Dem party wasn't able to convince the Republicans running NH into changing the law that NH has to schedule primaries first is an incredibly flimsy excuse.

There was nothing the NH Dem party could do to comply with the DNC.

And of all people, Biden should have been understanding that Dems can't force Republicans to do something they don't want to do.

Just making the demand to begin with was incredibly fucked up.

It was an impossible demand, and they act like it was an easy thing that the state party could somehow do with a snap of their fingers.

The only way it could have happened, is if the Dem party broke state law.

And a national party demanding a state party break their own laws to give the favored candidate an advantage is something I honestly thought would just be a Republican thing at least for a couple more elections cycles.

[-] norbert@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

Oh look a concern troll that's sooooooo concerned about NH and state party rules. This person 100% actually cares and isn't just trying to suppress the left vote.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I'm concerned that the only other option in American politics besides trump just wiped out an entire states primary for something the state party can't control...

If you're not upset about what that means, I don't know what else to say that wasn't in my first comment.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
288 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18904 readers
2867 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS