952
submitted 10 months ago by _number8_@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

this country is so fucking cool

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, loves talking about his creepy spy app he and his son have on their phone that alerts the other if they visit naughty sites. So the writers of this proposal and all that vote for it would be happy to put the same program on their devices and computers, right? And tie that straight to a public feed we can all see? Great Great.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 44 points 10 months ago

See when I read this story it isn't really that bad.

They believe porn is bad and use the app to keep each other accountable. I don't really have an issue with that. You do you.

But when they start trying to enforce that view through the government it's obviously not okay.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago

Aside from it being creepy as hell to do that with your son (who probably didn't have a say in the matter) this is a massive national security risk. Spyware on a Congress member's phone? Not a great idea.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

I'm imagining they have government issued phones and private phones. The government issued one for sure wouldn't be allowed to have that shit on it.

[-] GTKashi@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

That sounds reasonable and so it's probably not even remotely close to what actually happens.

[-] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

The craziest thing about the Hillary Clinton private email server was not that she had it, but that her predecessors also used private email for government stuff as Secretary of State. Not a one-off, but the norm. Absolutely nuts.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 5 points 10 months ago

I severely doubt they can install it on government equipment.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

Can you imagine that IT request?

"In having trouble installing this app on my phone. It's so my phone can be remotely monitored to make sure I'm not looking at porn."

"Could you just not try to look at porn on that phone?"

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

“Sir, you have a federal government IT department. Which federal agency do you want to tell your family if you watch porn? Don’t worry they already monitor your personal devices too.”

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Do you think Congress has the digital literacy and self discipline to keep separate phones and actually keep business separate between them?

Wasn't it just recently that a congressman was found hoarding gold bars? What phone do you think he negotiated those from?

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

“Putin needs to make sure I’m not watching gay porn.”

[-] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

It's creepy because it's his son, and he clearly is only doing it to control his kid.

You think the dad doesn't have a second device that's dedicated to wanking?

[-] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 4 points 10 months ago

How dare you demand him by suggesting he has a masturbation phone.

It's a Grindr phone...

Which only feeds his toxicity as no one on Grindr wants anything to do with this PoS.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 8 points 10 months ago

I don't have a problem between 2 consenting adults but monitoring a parent is creepy and weird. It's likely a case of him trying to set an example and prove he too is compliant, to his son, but it's just weird.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Just watched the Duggar documentary. This is shit they "voluntarily" do. If you don't, you'll likely suffer the ire of the elders and people in power.

[-] frickineh@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

And, as we learned from that same documentary, it's pretty easy to get around it. If that homeschooled sicko Josh can figure out how to partition his devices, I'm guessing plenty of others have figured it out, too.

[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I don't have a problem with their abstaining from porn, having personal feelings about its value or morality, or even using each other to remain accountable. I do think it's a little dumb to put spyware on your device intentionally and to share with your child when you accidentally fall to temptation exactly what sort of smut you enjoyed. But that's all them. Not my problem.

As you said the problem is when you're legislating to restrict others from something you have a personal issue with, particularly when that thing is completely personal. So if they're going to butt their way into the personal habits or desires of the general public, surely they have no problem sharing their own habits and desires with the public in return. And, in real time. I want to see what senators are jerking it to on their potty break during session.

[-] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 10 months ago

Sure, you do you, but it's still fucking weird.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 4 points 10 months ago

Yes but there are varying degrees. This is way out there.

[-] _dev_null@lemmy.zxcvn.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

creepy spy app

The only thing that spy app is making them do, is hiding a second phone from everyone. Guarantee it.

[-] KISSmyOS@feddit.de 5 points 10 months ago
[-] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Oops, a Freudian ~~Giant Cock In My Ass.~~ Slip.

this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
952 points (100.0% liked)

News

23367 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS