1031
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Bill Gates wants ultra-wealthy individuals to pay more tax — and now a growing chorus of billionaires agree.

In his annual "Ask Me Anything" forum on Reddit last year, the Microsoft cofounder said he was "surprised" that taxes for the rich haven't been increased more.

Gates doubled down on his calls to tax the rich in a panel at the World Economic Forum in Davos this week. He said the wealthiest nations should donate more money to developing countries to help redress inequality.

"Those who have the most — whether it's countries, companies, or individuals — should be pushed to be more generous," he said.

It seems others agree, as more than 250 ultra-wealthy people signed an open letter calling for global leaders to impose a wealth tax.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 39 points 8 months ago

Literally nothing is stopping any of them from cutting a massive check to the government. This is lip service to stop people from hating on the billionaire class.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 36 points 8 months ago

Except the issue is systemic. You have a percentage of mega wealthy who simply don’t even pay their share. A few billionaires sending a large check to the government doesn’t fix anything. They could but until we change the way we handle taxes for the wealthy, we have a systemic problem we need to fix.

Speaking out that all the rich should pay more helps (maybe) make the case that those making hella bank should pay more.

Your statement is a bit of a straw man which doesn’t actually address the fact that the mega rich aren’t paying their fair share.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 10 points 8 months ago

Except I wholeheartedly agree with you. There is a huge issue here, but at the same time if these billionaires truly believe that they should be paying more, they should just… do it. There is literally nothing stopping them. They should be forced to, yes, and that’s what they’re saying. But they should be putting their money where their mouths are in the meantime.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago

The man is covering like 11% of the WHO budget. On the one hand I want to say that that's too much power, OTOH he doesn't do too terribly a job at allocating money (compared to, say, the IMF) and every man deserves a hobby.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Ah I see. I apologize if my comment came off as overly rude. I have heard the comment of them sending money as a reason to do nothing.

I assumed you were advocating we do nothing, which to me implies keep the taxes low on the rich and just let them send whatever they want.

I think saying that their taxes should be raised is doing something. Sending extra cash money into the giant money pit is kinda pointless until we address the military industrial complex getting the lion’s share and we start using the money more effectively.

[-] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 8 months ago

The billionaires complaining about wealth taxes, should lead by example by paying them at the same time lobbying governments to fix the issue.

[-] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

They buy politicians left and right, but THIS issue is completely out of their hands.

Hang on, my eyes rolled so far back I need to cough them up now

[-] Signtist@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I mean, it's not like they're going to bribe the government into forcing them to pay greater taxes.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

If you are cutting massive checks for the social good, private charitable organizations are typically better stewards of the money than the government. Unless you want the military to have more fighter jets, I suppose

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Cutting massive checks into charities THEY own to hide it from being taxed...

FTFY....

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago
[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Except you think they're actually using the money for charity, when it is actually a way to pass the money to children/heirs without paying inheritance tax...

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

These philanthropy projects are definitely tax shields but they actually do have to do charitable work to keep their tax-exempt status.

[-] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

In theory, reality is not so much. Many of them do very very little.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

If you think billionaires paying more taxes to governments will mean better lives for the poor then oh boy do I have a bridge to sell you.

[-] SuiXi3D@kbin.social 8 points 8 months ago

No, obviously it takes those in government to have good intentions as well.

[-] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

It means better lives for those poor executives of military contractors. Think of Lockheed-Martin's children!

this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2024
1031 points (100.0% liked)

News

22896 readers
4374 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS