829
Obviously, supporting a New York real estate billionaire is anti-establishment for some reason (feddit.de)
submitted 2 years ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
98 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] davel@lemmy.ml 152 points 2 years ago

Socialist devs now

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 40 points 2 years ago

Socialism by definition is not anti establishment. It's anti current establishment but the philosophy is geared towards a bigger government "establishment".

[-] migo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 62 points 2 years ago

No, it is not. Socialism does not mean statism. Please feel free to read up on libertarian socialism, Anarcho syndicalism or even eco socialism. The Greens/EFA in europe lean towards libertarian socialism.

[-] entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 2 years ago

Libertarian socialist here: Say it again for the people at the back.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

I was 100% not aware if libertarian socialism. Definitely something to learn about. Thank you

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
829 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

53350 readers
705 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml