72
submitted 9 months ago by Pips@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

Is DEI the new CRT? What are the public grievances against DEI?

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 25 points 9 months ago

I don't even know what DEI is.

It would be nice if at least once a page someone fucking explains an acronym. It's a little more understandable when you can infer a meaning through context, but when the context is that people are using it as the new woke bogeyman it gives zero clue as to what it even is.

[-] Ooops@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You aren't wrong with your criticism in general (from a purely journalistic pov). But actually typing DEI into Google and clicking the first hit, would be more constructive than ranting.

[-] Zorque@kbin.social 17 points 9 months ago

If my only point was to learn what DEI was, sure. But that doesn't help with the next acronym. Or the next one. Or the next one. Ad nauseum.

My problem is with the trend of people just using an acronym with no definition, it means you are not making a coherent argument that can be understood by people not already invested in it. It, in and of itself, is little better than a rant to an audience that's already made up its mind.

[-] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 7 points 9 months ago

Abysmal practice if an acronym isn’t explained. That’s basic writing skills, never mind professional journalism.

[-] Dyskolos@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Instead of writing this, simply answering it with "Diversity, equity, and inclusion" would've been equally more constructive 😁

[-] UFODivebomb@programming.dev 8 points 9 months ago

Many of those adamant against the spooky woke bogeyman don't know what the words mean either!

[-] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

White supremacists are fearing the end of their rein

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Well sure, but that's not how they would frame it. I'm curious what their arguments against it are. They usually put a little spit and polish on their turds before feeding them to their faithful masses.

[-] GnomeKat 2 points 9 months ago

They claim its racist to have policies that try to promote diversity. They claim its giving preferential treatment to minorities which is not color blind and thus racist in their view.

(to be clear i think this line of thinking is dumb a duck but it's what I see when people try to argue it)

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I really enjoy those honey badger nature vids online. Watching this angry little weasel go pick a fight with 6 lions. Jumping from one to other and ruining their day. This ball of pure malice and hate that is forever in need of a target. One of the only critters on earth that will kill for the joy of it.

I am glad I sure don't know any humans like that. Especially not those in power, not ones who have zero interest in building or even maintaining things. Just rage and the ability to hurt.

this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
72 points (100.0% liked)

News

23275 readers
3464 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS