291
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by dirtmayor@beehaw.org to c/politics@beehaw.org

Archive Link from archive.today

Original Link from The New York Times

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nicholas@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Looking at this as non-partisan as I can... if Hillary wasn't convicted for essentially doing the exact same thing (and deleting the evidence...) then I really don't see any way for Trump to be convicted either.

[-] Kinbladez@beehaw.org 16 points 1 year ago

What she did is not at all "essentially doing the exact same thing". At all. I'm not saying she's not probably guilty of some crime at some point because most of our politicians are corrupt, but you are absolutely misinformed if you think she kept hundreds of classified documents, showed them off to people, and lied to federal investigators about it.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 1 year ago

You're right... it's worse. She covered her tracks by deleting all the data then lying about it.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

I assume you have evidence of this?

[-] alyaza@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

you'd think if she actually did commit a crime the FBI would have actually charged and prosecuted her, considering they found the accusations so serious they essentially--unintentionally or intentionally, depending on how cynical you want to view this--interfered with a democratic election in publicly announcing they were investigating just days before the 2016 presidential election. and yet!

In May, the State Department's Office of the Inspector General released a report about the State Department's email practices, including Clinton's. In July, FBI director James Comey announced that the FBI investigation had concluded that Clinton had been "extremely careless" but recommended that no charges be filed because Clinton did not act with criminal intent, the historical standard for pursuing prosecution.[7]

A three-year State Department investigation concluded in September 2019 that 38 individuals were "culpable" in 91 instances of sending classified information that reached Clinton's email account, though it found "no persuasive evidence of systemic, deliberate mishandling of classified information".[15] Yet a September 2022 "Fact Checker" analysis by The Washington Post, which followed a tweet by Clinton claiming, "I had zero emails that were classified", also quotes the same 2019 State Department report as having noted, "None of the emails at issue in this review were marked as classified."[1]

load more comments (18 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
291 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
42 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS