77
submitted 10 months ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

You can't buy chocolate and a ton of other common ingredients without supporting slavery. There's no ethical consumption under capitalism, the HP franchise is a small drop in the ocean of suffering. Expecting peole to be aware of all those things and also boycott every single one is not feasible and should be solved top down.

[-] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 4 points 10 months ago

I can't argue with that for sure, but here it's specifically against Rowling. You can't pretend to be boycotting her and keep giving her money through her licenses.

[-] FluffyPotato@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Oh yea true, if anyone is claiming they are boycotting Rowling then they can't really buy any media associated with her while still boycotting her, that's just a contradiction.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Lol OK, no shit, but that's not what I said anyway.

this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
77 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8514 readers
459 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS