823
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Just because Republicans choose unreality doesn’t mean the media should ignore the facts of January 6.

On January 6, 2021, I watched CNN as thousands of Donald Trump supporters stormed the US Capitol. As someone well-versed in watching tragedy on television, I was struck by just how indisputable the facts were at the time: violent, red-hat-clad MAGA rioters, followed by Republicans in Congress, tried to stop democracy in its tracks. Trump had told his followers that the protest in Washington, DC, “will be wild,” and in the assault that followed his speech, some rioters smeared feces on the walls of the Capitol. Hundreds of them have since been convicted on charges ranging from assault on federal officers to seditious conspiracy. These are stubborn facts, the kind that do not care about your feelings. These facts include the inalienable truth that Trump is the first president in American history to reject the peaceful transfer of power.

It never occurred to me that these facts could somehow be perverted by partisanship. But three years later, we are seeing just that, as Republicans cling to the lie that the 2020 election was “stolen” by Joe Biden and are poised to make Trump their 2024 nominee. And perhaps even more dangerous than the GOP ditching reality is the news media’s inability to cover Trumpism as the threat to democracy that it very much is.

...

But the problem is, when all you have is conventional political framing, everything looks like politics as usual. One candidate makes a claim; the other disputes it. Two sides are divided, etc. This framing only works if both parties operate within the frameworks of a shared reality. But Trumpism doesn’t allow for the reality the rest of us inhabit. Trump’s supporters believe their leader’s reality and not, say, the reality the rest of us see with our eyes. As Trump once told a crowd: “Don’t believe the crap you see from these people, the fake news. What you’re seeing and what you’re reading is not what’s happening.”

Journalists may be well-intentioned in trying to be “objective,” or they’re simply afraid of being labeled partisan. Either way, coverage of January 6 that gives equal weight to both sides—one based in reality, one not—is helping pave the road for authoritarianism.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago

All well and good, but these idiot kids are actually refusing to vote for him over this single issue. I agree that It’s fine to be bothered how he’s handling things- even if they’re a bit misunderstood on how things actually work- I mean, sure…it’s bothering.

But this is the biggest “I’m cutting off my nose to spite my face” America will EVER see.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 20 points 11 months ago

Single issue lmao. "Yeah Hitler did genocide but that's just a single issue"

OK dude.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

If we want to win, we need to appeal to people who disagree with your support for genocide, no matter how much you hate them.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nobody hates you, we're just sick of idealists in a time when we need pragmatists.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Those pesky idealists... being opposed to checks notes literal fucking genocide.

I'm voting for Biden and you don't care. You just want unquestioning support for the genocide you support.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago
[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

Do you think any person elected to the presidency wouldn't continue supporting Israel? To cut off funding and weapons to Israel would be absolute political suicide in this country. Don't care if it's Biden, Trump, Desantis, doesn't matter. Israel will continue to get $Billions and weapons. It's just the way it is.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

Do you think any person elected to the presidency wouldn’t continue supporting Israel?

cornel west and jill stein would.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

But neither of them will win. So they’re both irrelevant.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

where did you get your crystal ball?

[-] asret@lemmy.zip 5 points 11 months ago

I admire your optimism, but I think the black socialist professor and intersectional activist might find it difficult to sway enough votes on either side. It's a shame you don't have a better voting system where you can rank your preferred candidates - would avoid much of these stupid games.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

voting sucks in pretty much every system.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago
[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you actually believed that, and weren't an idealist centrism and genocide yourself, you would pragmatically demand a primary to choose a candidate who could win and not try and demand unearned votes through shaming.

You're as pragmatic as a college kid carrying around a dog-eared copy of 'Atlas Shrugged'

[-] Soulg@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

So your solution is to make it easier for Trump to win? You know that would make things even worse?

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

The only thing that is making it easier for Trump to win is Biden's unwavering support for the genocide centrists have evidently always wanted.

[-] badaboomxx@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Do you realize that the war won't stop with the orangeoutan right?

[-] Count042@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago

You misspelled 'genocide' as 'war'

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

For the love of fuck, how many times do I have to tell you genocide supporters that I don't support Trump?

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheAlbacor@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Right, how could someone not want to vote for someone because they support genocide? How ludicrous.

I'll still vote for Biden because I'll already be in the booth, but sitting back and acting like this is our only option is nonsense.

Voting alone does not create change. Labor Movement, Women's Suffrage, Civil Rights, all were accomplished by active resistance and here you are spouting nonsense about how we should all just participate in the system that's circling the drain instead of disrupting it.

The longer you all take to come around the worse it will get, no matter which major party is in the Oval Office.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

You idiots are going to find out pretty quick why you should have voted, if Trump wins. I hope you like genocides much closer to home.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

I’ll still vote for Biden

You idiots are going to find out pretty quick why you should have voted

Centrists would rather lecture than listen.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

The people who can find a way to excuse, minimize or ignore Biden's military and political support for genocide could probably find a way to excuse, minimize or ignore just about anything. There is no bottom, only partisanship and convenience.

[-] asret@lemmy.zip 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Sure, but if you're planning on sticking around in America, or care about its influence worldwide, shouldn't you at least try to steer it towards the least worst option?

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

The only people who have influence around here are the wealthy and corporations. I don't think two choices between two old genocidal men is the best example of saving democracy, as you can tell people still suffered and died under the "harm reduction" guy.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

So just do nothing then. That’ll show em both!

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Well get to pushing Biden left. I'm sure it will work out this time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

the least worst option is cornel west.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

no one calls me a kid any more, and this single issue is the straw that broke the camel's back.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Okay kid. I’m sure your vote for Trump is appreciated.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

i'm probably gonna be voting for cornel west, actually.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

Like I said, I’m sure your vote for Trump is greatly appreciated.

[-] federatingIsTooHard@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

I'm voting against Trump, actually

load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2024
823 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2090 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS