245

Joe Biden campaign volunteers are quitting in "droves" (www.newsweek.com)

submitted 10 months ago by Silverseren@kbin.social to c/politics@lemmy.world

190 comments fedilink hide all child comments

In a letter published Wednesday on Medium, an anonymous group of Biden's campaign staffers demanded the president call for a ceasefire in Gaza, citing concerns that not shifting his policy on the issue could hurt his 2024 chances.

"Biden for President staff have seen volunteers quit in droves, and people who have voted blue for decades feel uncertain about doing so for the first time ever, because of this conflict," the Medium letter read.

"It is not enough to merely be the alternative to Donald Trump," the campaigners continued. "The campaign has to shift the feeling in the pits of voters' stomachs, the same feeling that weighs on us every day as we fight for your reelection. The only way to do that is to call for a ceasefire."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Just so we're clear, the source for this article is an anonymous post to Medium that claims to be from 17 staffers.

This is not "news"

https://medium.com/@BidenHQforCeasefireNow/dear-president-biden-we-need-a-ceasefire-now-f48b732b2433

[-] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

And it didn't even provide any evidence that volunteers were quitting in droves.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

The letter was organized by campaign staffers. Five of them confirmed the authenticity of the letter to West Wing Playbook. Those staffers, who were granted anonymity because of their concern of backlash, said they were motivated to organize their letter out of a sense of moral responsibility.

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/03/biden-campaign-anonymous-letter-israel-hamas-00133705

Nice try though to ignore the issue.

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

You realize that article uses the same source right? It explicitly states it early on.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 6 points 10 months ago

Yes, and states that the authenticity of those behind it were confirmed. So it's not "claims to be from 17 staffers", we know for a fact that it IS from 17 staffers. It is only anonymous to protect them from getting attacked from AIPAC and related groups, as they have been doing to anyone that criticizes Israel and has any prominence.

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Where does it say that the identities were confirmed? I've read the entire article like 3 times looking for it and can't seem to find it.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Did you not read the comment of mine you previously replied to? Where I quoted from a Politico article?

[-] HandBreadedTools@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Yes, I'm referring to the politico article. Where does it say in the politico article that the identities were confirmed?

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

Literally the part I quoted above.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

YES BUT WHERE, WHICH LETTER? NOT A SINGLE LETTER BUT MULTIPLE LETTERS??

SUSPICIOUS.

CHECKMATE, LIBERAL.

[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 2 points 10 months ago

They want you to drive to their house, visit the site, select the quote and point at it 👉☝️😺

[-] Knightfox@lemmy.one 5 points 10 months ago

17 does not equal droves

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024

245 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers

3051 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News