770
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Giving Biden credit for more jobs after the pandemic is like saying Bill Clinton's pro corporate policies caused the dotcom boom...

Or that it was his over zealous crackdown on nonviolent offenders that caused the decline in crime rate and not the normal effect of banning leaded gas decades earlier, something that we saw across the globe on the same timeline after they banned it.

You're doing the same thing Republicans do, giving credit to your "team" for things that would have happened anyways.

And waaaaaay over exaggerating how much got fixed.

How? Exactly how could he have achieved this? Please detail it.

How does anything get made a law?

We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency...

If you're saying it's not Bidens fault nothing got done, how is it he's the one that got literally anything else done?

You're making it out to be Biden has zero power, but you just gave him credit for increasing fossil fuels production?

Is there any logic behind this to you? Or are you just saying every good the ng is only because of Biden, and every bad thing is something he couldn't do.

Who honestly believes that?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

We had two years where Dems controlled the House, Senate, and presidency…

No. We had two years where Dems controlled the House and the Presidency and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin. What specifically would have convinced Sinema and, especially, Manchin to agree to codify abortion? Because, if you weren't aware, the Democrats did try to codify abortion and Manchin specifically blocked it.

So what should they have done to convince Manchin? Or do you think they could have convinced a Republican to take their side? Because I sure as hell don't.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

and were challenged at every move by Sinema and Manchin

I'd take that as an excuse if Biden hasn't spent the whole primary and election telling us that he can get dem legislation thru a Republican Senate....

Then we (luckily) end up with 50 D senators, and Biden told us it was pointless to try.

That doesn't really change anything, because Biden was already expecting to have to fight a Republican Senate and get a couple votes.

Hell, the whole reason we got 50 was the GA runoff when Biden was still saying 50 D's would be enough to pass the whole platform.

Do you think Joe "Senate whisperer" Biden just didn't know who Manchin was?

If so, why couldn't he still get those few R votes he promised he could get?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

So it’s Biden’s fault that republicans are opposing anything the democrats are doing?

You’re playing right into their game with that kind of thinking.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's my fault for listening to what Biden said he could?

I should have known he would blatantly lie to get elected and then immediately act like I'm an idiot for thinking what he said was true?

But also...

This time I should listen to Biden and it totally won't happen again....

Have you ever thought about why voter turnout goes down for incumbents?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Not always.

Trump got more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016 and there's no reason to believe Biden isn't going to get more considering it's an exact repeat.

Biden has been fixing Trump's dumpster fire and most reasonable people can see that.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Total votes almost always go up due to population increase over the last 4 years...

When people talk about turnout, we're talking about percent of eligible voters.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That says overall turnout increased 7%< not that trump increased his by 7%... Not sure if you noticed, but he lost 2020...

And that's not even getting into how trump did what Republican voters wanted, Biden hasn't .

So even if Trump's went up, what does that have to do with Biden's?

But I'm tired of not noticing your username till I'm roped into conversations.

I'd rather just never see it again, so that's what I'm doing. Don't expect anymore replies, I'll never see them.

Have a good day u/SatansMaggotyCumFart

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Your comment:

Have you ever thought about why voter turnout goes down for incumbents?

My response:

...voter turnout rose 7 percentage points over 2016, resulting in a total of 66% of U.S. adult citizens casting a ballot in the 2020 election.

So you move goalposts and get pissed off for being called out and block me? En

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Then we (luckily) end up with 50 D senators, and Biden told us it was pointless to try.

They literally tried. Did you even read my link?

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Manchin isn't even a Democrat anymore, and even before he made that official, it was already de facto true.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
  1. So you're saying even tho it was obvious, Biden and his people didn't see it coming?

  2. How does that change Bidens presumption that it would be a Republican Senate?

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024
770 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS