770

A Far-Right Court Just Admitted a Truth That Abortion Foes Want to Hide (slate.com)

submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

127 comments fedilink hide all child comments

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, it claimed to be removing the judiciary from the abortion debate. In reality, it simply gave the courts a macabre new task: deciding how far states can push a patient toward death before allowing her to undergo an emergency abortion.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit offered its own answer, declaring that Texas may prohibit hospitals from providing “stabilizing treatment” to pregnant patients by performing an abortion—withholding the procedure until their condition deteriorates to the point of grievous injury or near-certain death.

The ruling proves what we already know: Roe’s demise has transformed the judiciary into a kind of death panel that holds the power to elevate the potential life of a fetus over the actual life of a patient.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

It's my fault for listening to what Biden said he could?

I should have known he would blatantly lie to get elected and then immediately act like I'm an idiot for thinking what he said was true?

But also...

This time I should listen to Biden and it totally won't happen again....

Have you ever thought about why voter turnout goes down for incumbents?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Not always.

Trump got more votes in 2020 than he did in 2016 and there's no reason to believe Biden isn't going to get more considering it's an exact repeat.

Biden has been fixing Trump's dumpster fire and most reasonable people can see that.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Total votes almost always go up due to population increase over the last 4 years...

When people talk about turnout, we're talking about percent of eligible voters.

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The 2020 presidential election was historic in many ways. Amid a global pandemic, with unprecedented changes in how Americans voted, voter turnout rose 7 percentage points over 2016, resulting in a total of 66% of U.S. adult citizens casting a ballot in the 2020 election.

I was.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

That says overall turnout increased 7%< not that trump increased his by 7%... Not sure if you noticed, but he lost 2020...

And that's not even getting into how trump did what Republican voters wanted, Biden hasn't .

So even if Trump's went up, what does that have to do with Biden's?

But I'm tired of not noticing your username till I'm roped into conversations.

I'd rather just never see it again, so that's what I'm doing. Don't expect anymore replies, I'll never see them.

Have a good day u/SatansMaggotyCumFart

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Your comment:

Have you ever thought about why voter turnout goes down for incumbents?

My response:

...voter turnout rose 7 percentage points over 2016, resulting in a total of 66% of U.S. adult citizens casting a ballot in the 2020 election.

So you move goalposts and get pissed off for being called out and block me? En

this post was submitted on 04 Jan 2024

770 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19104 readers

2352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News