240
How do you feel about Tom Scott going on hiatus after 10 years?
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
240 points (100.0% liked)
[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation
6616 readers
1 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
- Encourage conversation in your post
- Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
- Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information
Related discussion-focused communities
- !actual_discussion@lemmy.ca
- !askmenover30@lemm.ee
- !dads@feddit.uk
- !letstalkaboutgames@feddit.uk
- !movies@lemm.ee
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It doesn't necessarily bother me that he's retiring from weekly videos, but there's something to be said for the comfort of regular videos from a person you've grown to like over the years.
Humans are by their nature social animals, and there's really no harm in mourning the end of an era, however small it may be.
Watching a one-sided YouTube video isn't social.
Is watching TV by yourself social? The fuck?
This just in, you don't actually have a personal or social relationship with YouTube creators, you have parasocial relationship with them.
Dude, it’s “my favorite show is ending” not “omg i miss my friend”
Just saying the words “YouTube” really being people out of the woodwork doesn’t it
I never said watching a video is a social activity, I said humans are social animals. They crave connection, be it face to face, or a parasocial experience. Some people take it too far - as can be said about anything - but the vast majority of people keep it well within a healthy range.
I also don't think it's sad at all. Humans have had emotional connections to "characters" for as long as storytelling has existed. If you can't see (or refuse to see) how this is an extension of that fundamental human experience, there's nothing I can say to convince you.
Its para-social.
Its sad but these relationships might be some of the 'most' meaningful relationships some people have.
It's incredibly sad, and as much as I have never had to endure that yet I'm sure I and many other will experience it at some point in our lives as we get older and all our friends die, leaving us all alone.
So you've never felt sad or emotional about a character in a book, or a film? You've never regretted that a TV series ended? Never been attached to any inanimate object (favorite shirt gifted by a dead family member f.e.), or whatever? These are all the same function. Yes, a lot of people take it too far and invest themselves too strongly. But this is fundamental to all functioning humans.
Humans create connections by their very nature, and if they don't - they're mentally ill and probably not fit for human society at large.
your brain treats para-social relationships extremely similarly to social relationships, which is the whole reason its a thing in the first place
acting all surprised and befuddled because someone talks about a content creator this way while invoking para-social relationships is extremely weird