254
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by drumdonuttea@kbin.social to c/RedditMigration@kbin.social

As we start to see more users join, it's inevitable to see trolls (especially low-effort trolls) making more of an appearance and trying to be controversial and noticed.

Best just to scroll past them. They want to spark unwinnable arguments and rack up negative rep. If something seems absurdly ridiculous or inciteful, just move on. It's not even worth down voting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago

Not sure there’s anything to report with the previous comment; yet I don’t disagree with it being a dick thing to say.

[-] BurntPunk@kbin.social 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Way back in the way back we used to call comments like that “flame baiting”. It’s trying to start a fight, nothing more. Forums and BBs I moderated used to technically ban it, but generally the rule has always just been “don’t feed the trolls”. Meaning: don’t comment, don’t downvote, don’t bother reporting. They just want attention, the only thing that hurts them is realizing that this board will ignore them just as completely as their parents already do in real life.

[-] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Back then there wasn't any upvoting or downvoting, so the only way you interacted with a troll is either engage them or ignore them...preferably the latter.

Images like this were typical...yet helpful.

[-] jherazob@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Holy crap this is an image I hadn't seen in ages! 😃

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

The k-soc terms of service state:

Harassment, hate speech, or any other form of harmful behavior will not be tolerated.

Now, I can't read ernest's mind to determine what he meant by this line exactly, but this kind of mean spirited, bad-faith jab falls under "harmful behaviour" in my book.

[-] tikitaki@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

i think it's dangerous to be too broad with this definition

harmful in my mind is saying explicitly racist, homophobic, promoting violent, etc type of stuff

i think freedom of expression is something we should not give up easily. in actually harmful speech, i think the pros outweigh the cons. but him saying the word "triggered" is not harmful

[-] Crankpork@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

but him saying the word "triggered" is not harmful

It implies that being against hate speech and harassment is a wrong opinion and while completely isolated and out of context it might not seem harmful, it's part of a cultural shift towards normalizing those things, and implies that anyone who cares is wrong. Seeing that go unchallenged just emboldens buttholes like that.

[-] tikitaki@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

yes, of course. it's indicative of that type of worldview and it's demeaning

however the key important part is that it isn't hate speech. being pro-hate speech and using hate speech are two different things

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
254 points (100.0% liked)

Reddit Migration

207 readers
2 users here now

### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/

founded 1 year ago