1368
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] profdc9@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Your honor, the AI told me it was ok. And computers are never wrong!

[-] DannyMac@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

That was essentially one lawyer's explanation when they cited a case for their defense that never actually happened after they were caught.

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

This is just a new example of an ongoing thing with legal research. A case that was "good caselaw" a year ago can be overturned or distinguished into oblivion by later cases. Lawyers are frequently chastised for failing to "Shepardize" their caselaw (meaning look into the cases their citing and make sure it's relevant and still accurate).

We've just made it one step easier to forget to actually check your work.

[-] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 10 months ago

The cases I've seen lawyers in trouble for citing don't even exist, they weren't overturned. The LLM is just stringing together case names that sound real. But good lawyers are using llms to get rid of the tedium of a lot of boilerplate writing (and claiming they can charge you less which they probably aren't).

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
1368 points (100.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5742 readers
1780 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS