194
submitted 10 months ago by Mazdak@lemmy.org to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

And he's perfectly correct. Insurrections happen from below - Trump was literally the president of the damn country.

No, he's not an insurrectionist. You could make the case that this was an (extremely) bumbling attempt at an autocoup... but it's such an incompetent one that it hardly justifies the word outside of a purely legal framework. He should have asked the dictators from those "shithole countries" he famously disparaged how to do it - they'd show him how properly done autocoups really work.

What I find so strange is that the media in the US doesn't want to talk about what Trump actually did - sicc a white lynch mob on the capitol. That's what it was. Fortunately, it was a very incompetent one - the only people they managed to lynch was some of their fascist besties (ie, police - the institution that protected Trump's fascist enablers from antifa when they were marching in the streets). Yet, for some reason, everybody looks at this and squeals, "insurrection!" instead of calling it what it really is.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago

insurrection /ĭn″sə-rĕk′shən/

noun

  1. The act or an instance of open revolt against civil authority or a constituted government.
  1. A rising up; uprising.
  1. The act of rising against civil authority or governmental restraint; specifically, the armed resistance of a number of persons to the power of the state; incipient or limited rebellion.

He did all three of those things. He's an insurrectionist.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago
  1. Trump was the government at the time.

  2. He didn't rise to squat - there was literally nothing above him to "rise" against.

  3. See no.1

No insurrection to see here, Clyde.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

No. The president was not the government. He was not a dictator. When the president sends people to the houses of Congress to stop his electoral loss, it is an insurrection.

And what he and his people rose up against was the certification of Joe Biden's electoral win. That is an insurrection.

Furthermore- Trump was literally taken off the Colorado ballot due to his responsibility for an insurrection.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

And what he and his people rose up against

Lol! Hey, if you are really desperate to pretend that Trump is some kind of "underdog" "rebelling" against the establishment, be my guest.

Trump and his ilk is the establishment - there is absolutely nothing for them to "insurrect" against. Hasn't been in the US since a pack of rich slavers decided to pretend to be revolutionaries.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

I am not pretending any such thing. And, again, the court literally found that he was responsible for an insurrection. Why is the court wrong? Because if it's wrong, Trump should be on the ballot in Colorado. Is that what you believe?

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I am not pretending any such thing.

This you?

And what he and his people rose up against was the certification of Joe Biden’s electoral win.

Zig-zagging sideways does not conflate to up.

Because if it’s wrong, Trump should be on the ballot in Colorado.

Is that what you are really worried about? A rich white supremacist trust-fund baby sicced a white lynch mob on people in the US in front of the world's cameras, got away with it scott-free and you think your problems only extends to said white supremacist trust-fund baby ending up in the Waffle House again?

I'd say you might want to start worrying about the factors that enabled him to be there in the first place.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong. It's sort of looking like you aren't able to. I'm guessing it's because you aren't a legal expert.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

He's zig-zagging his way there.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I will be surprised if I get a response to that, to be honest.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 2 points 10 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And all he has to do is explain why the Colorado supreme court was wrong. It's so weird that he keeps avoiding that despite being asked directly, isn't it? Surely he's a Constitutional legal scholar.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling that he fomented insurrection is wrong.

Are you placing your trust in the same institutions that are trying to convict the people protesting Pig City on racketeering and terrorism charges?

Or is your mind so thoroughly gouged by liberal brain-rot that fascism becomes perfectly acceptable to you as long as it's approved by the people "higher up" than you?

Do tell... are white lynch mobs technically illegal in the country that enshrines slavery in it's constitution?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

You still have not explained why the Colorado ruling is wrong. "Other rulings were wrong" doesn't explain while this ruling is wrong.

Again, I think the answer is you aren't a legal expert despite acting like you are.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago

Are you trusting the same gas(oxygen) that caused an extinction event and is known to kill people when exposed to fire??

what are you? stupid?

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Denying the truth doesn't make it untrue

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago
  1. Trump was the government at the time.

I'm sorry, did people break into the Whitehouse or Congress? He's the Executive, not the entire government.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 10 months ago

Trump was the government at the time.

Big Louis XIV energy there.

[-] itslilith 16 points 10 months ago

just because he's bad at it doesn't mean he didn't try

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

The president serves the people, the nation.

The country is not owned by the President.

The President is not a king.

It is not their's to do with as they please.

It is a job.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

The president serves the people, the nation.

Your proof of this is what?

The country is not owned by the President.

No argument from me. It might be a good idea to ask who it is that actually do own it, though.

The President is not a king.

Kings aren't kings any more.

this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
194 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2795 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS