683
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 105 points 2 years ago

Ahh yes, the woman who wanted to... (checks notes) hmm copyright a fucking date because she used it for an album...

Ffs there is no such thing as an ethical money hungry person.

[-] dQw4w9WgXcQ@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago

I mean, there's probably a ton of crap on her. I have no idea, I haven't read up on her, but I would assume that every billionaire has a lot of smoking guns with regard to pollution, bad work conditions and unethical handling of capital. But if the worst you have on her is that she attempted to copyright '1989', it doesn't really seem too bad.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

Her private jet has the most CO2 emissions out of any celebrity. She defended that by saying she rents it out, so it wasn't all her; as if that changes how much the private jet she owns has emitted. As far as the rest of her environmental impact, it is likely no worse than other performing celebrities so not great but in larger amounts than other celebs.

She does seem to do well by her support staff. She gave out $55m in bonuses to everyone who worked on her last tour.

She has donated a lot, but I couldn't find out if she has donated over the deduction cap or if she claimed the donations. As far as I can tell the majority has been given to food insecurity charities and disaster relief. So even if it is a tax scheme, she seems to be giving in the right direction.

I am not a fan of her music, but she doesn't seem like a terrible person except that she has unimaginable wealth, a massive platform, a highly influential brand, and isn't doing as much as she could to help others.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

There's no pleasing some people, is there?

[-] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Not when you're a billionaire buckerino. Taylor swift might be a slightly more ethical billionaire than the rest, but the fact that she is a billionaire at all is a symptom of the underlying systemic problem - the ideal number of billionaires in our world in its current state, is ZERO. Nada. Null.

You can sit there and sigh all you want, but a billionaire who's even slightly morally upright won't be a billionaire for long.

The only billionaire I'll ever consider as even slightly ethical, or as someone to look up to, is Chuck Feeney, god rest his soul.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It must be exhausting being like you.

[-] kttnpunk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

It must be exhausting making excuses for people hoarding unfathomable amounts of wealth, or are you paid to do that?

[-] justabigemptyhole@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Won't someone think of the billionaires?!

[-] t_jpeg@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Second of all they're right. It IS exhausting being like this, but someone has to do it. Because if people aren't being exhaustingly fed up of the status quo, billionaires will keep fucking us up, down and sideways. I almost wish I COULD be like Ilovethebomb. Ignorance, willing or not, is bliss afterall...

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Do you actually think you're changing anything by being like this?

[-] t_jpeg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The mindset behind this comment confuses me. Who do you think is more called to action by their beliefs, the one who vehemently opposes the status quo or those one who is apathetic to/ supports it?

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

You didn't answer my question.

Do you think being insufferable on the Internet will change the world in any measurable way?

[-] t_jpeg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's only insufferable to you because it make you feel uncomfortable.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

No, just bored.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

or are you paid to do that?

No, winding you up is something I do for fun.

[-] 1847953620@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

not if people like them. I like them.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago

Copyright is often quite context sensitive, it doesn't mean nobody can use that date, they just can't name an album after it.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
683 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

9040 readers
1767 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS