312
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A former Bay Area tech CEO was fired earlier this year after allegedly enslaving, torturing, and sexually abusing his assistant. He claims the pair had a consensual relationship that people would "celebrate" if it were fictitious.

Former Tradeshift CEO Christian Lanng denied the allegations levied against him and the billion-dollar company he co-founded that were made by a former employee in court Thursday.

"The shocking and vile claims in the lawsuit are categorically false, and I reject allegations that I subjected someone to any form of abuse during my tenure as CEO or at any other time of my life,” Lanng told The Messenger.

In the complaint, an unidentified woman alleged that Lanng sent her into “a dark abyss of unwanted sexual horror," according to The Mercury News.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Neato@kbin.social 130 points 2 years ago

You can not have sex with your employee or employer. The power dynamic ensures it can never be totally equal and there will always be some duress. If someone holds the power over your finances including your health insurance, saying No is never that simple.

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 30 points 2 years ago

I never thought of it that way. I always thought of it as "don't shit where you eat" because I ain't at work to make friends. I'm here to get shit done.

[-] Letstakealook@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago

It's both, really. After some misadventures in my youth, I have refused to engage romantically with anyone in an organization I'm employed by. "Don't shit where you eat." As I have moved up to supervise others, it goes doubly so for people within my chain of command. That would be highly unethical.

Essentially, one is practical advice and the other is a matter of ethics. If you follow the first, the ethics are easy.

[-] ickplant@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

You never had to sit through a sexual harassment training where they explain quid pro quo?

[-] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Numerous times, and I may have even paid attention once or twice. I generally don't do anything involving harassment because its wrong and immoral, because having relations with coworkers is not what I consider morally acceptable due to the risks to anyone involved in such an affair and in general, against my own moral judgement.

And I have SEEN harassment in the workplace.

[-] Akisamb@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

I think it's healthy to have clear boundaries with coworkers, they are not the same things as friends.

That said I spend 41 hours a week working, no way I'm not going to socialise with my coworkers. If I don't make any friends after several years of working at a place I feel I have done something wrong.

[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They were dating before he hired her, also mentions that hiring her was a mistake

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

She says they were never dating.

[-] Weslee@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I must have missed that in the article

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

It wasn't in this article. It is here.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Honestly best take. There's a lot to this story I'm sure and I think it needs to be discovered in a court.

I'm hopeful it's a truly fair court case as everyone has their right to their day in court.

[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's never that simple, sure. Which means it isn't as simple as saying categorically "you can not".

[-] lemminger@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago
[-] ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

So, it IS that simple? 🤦

No, it isn't. You just love pretending to have any nuance, when you're a hard core conservative.

this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
312 points (100.0% liked)

News

36118 readers
2954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS