137
submitted 2 years ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 17 points 2 years ago

Greedy google doing greedy google things.

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Greedy old news companies thinking they should be paid every time google displays a link or one of us posts to social media.. THe way the bill is structured links to news sites posted HERE on lemmy.ca may make lemmy.ca responsible for paying for them to the old news companies.

It's a bad law.

[-] visiblink@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Section 6 of the bill reads as follows: "This Act applies in respect of a digital news intermediary if, having regard to the following factors, there is a significant bargaining power imbalance between its operator and news businesses:

(a) the size of the intermediary or the operator;

(b) whether the market for the intermediary gives the operator a strategic advantage over news businesses; and

(c) whether the intermediary occupies a prominent market position."

I don't think anyone could reasonably define lemmy.ca as a powerful news intermediary.

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

Are you presuming that it never becomes popular? All three aspects vaguely describe the intermediary as being more popular than the news operator. If lemmy takes off and becomes the next Reddit and people go to it to catch up on the latest news it would be a factor.

Just because it does not fit today does not mean it isn't a bad law. It would essentially apply to ANY site that becomes popular and links to a canadian news outlet.

[-] visiblink@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 2 years ago

I didn't say anything about popularity, but no, I don't think Lemmy will become popular at the scale the act envisions. Most people will continue to use corporate services for the foreseeable future.

There's a difference between popular and powerful though, and I hope the courts would be capable of making that distinction. I also see a couple of references to the "market" in the act, which I think should exclude Lemmy as long as it's not-for-profit.

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

"There’s a difference between popular and powerful though" Not legally no the terms in this bill are very poorly defined. Really any "popular" / "large" website that links to Canadian news could be targeted with the open wording of the bill.

[-] Christos@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

F*ck these bozos who dont understand how much this is going to screw canadian news sites. They just see google gets owned and support whatever tf it is like sheep. Awful law

[-] AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

I am amazed at how people don't understand that vague law that takes out there "Current enemy" could be used against them down the road.. THERE IS NO SUPPORT OF GOOGLE or facebook.. it is a bad law that could be turned around to start playing whack mole with lemmy instances in the future, especially those run by a Canadian entity or on canadian hosting.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago
[-] eltimablo@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago
[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[-] eltimablo@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

And the comment responding to it did a wonderful job of rebutting your point, so I won't repeat it.

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It didn't actually. It is fascinating to find so many pro-authoritarian pro-billionaire tech fascist accounts on Lemmy.

[-] BuoyantCitrus@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Just because we want thoughtful regulation does not mean we support Meta and Alphabet. Why is this fascinating or surprising? Do you think the EFF is a huge fan of link taxes or Facebook?

[-] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

They have had years to change and thoughtfully regulate themselves and refused. These fascist billionaire companies profit by sowing chaos in our democracy and pushing propaganda into our population without even paying taxes. To hell with Meta and Alphabet.

[-] eltimablo@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

That's a whole lot of assumptions you're making about me there, all because I said there are problems with a law. I guess Lemmy isn't all that different from reddit after all.

[-] Kichae@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

It did no such thing. The commenter doesn't even seem to be aware that "Lemmy" isn't a place or organization.

Lemmy is 1000 independent websites, run by 1000 different independent individuals. And no single website running Lemmy will be in a position to wield influence over news media organizations.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

What strategic advantage does Lemmy have? It's open source ffs

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
137 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7299 readers
686 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS