640
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Ken Paxton issues threat after judge ruled this week that Cox, a pregnant woman with a lethal fetal diagnosis, can get an abortion

The Texas attorney general, Ken Paxton, has threatened to prosecute any doctor who provides an abortion to Kate Cox, a woman with a non-viable pregnancy, advising hospitals to ignore a court order issued on Thursday allowing her to get the procedure.

The rightwing Paxton issued the warning to three Houston-area hospitals after a Texas judge ruled this week that Cox, a pregnant woman with a lethal fetal diagnosis, may obtain an abortion under the narrow medical exceptions offered by the state bans.

In a brazen dismissal of the court’s decision, Paxton wrote that the judge’s order “will not insulate hospitals, doctors or anyone else from civil and criminal liability”.

Paxton also wrote that the hospital where Cox obtains an abortion “may be liable for negligent credentialing the physician” who performs the procedure.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Reading this as a non-American, it feels surreal. How can such a basic right be stripped from all women, and then have men stand up and defend such a disgusting situation. Do they have no shame? No moral compass?

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 16 points 11 months ago

Do they have no shame? No moral compass?

They don't. That's what it means to be a Republican.

[-] urist 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I don't like the other person's response about republican shame/morality. I think it's important to understand why these people do the things they do. Pretending they're mustache-twirlingly evil doesn't do anything but blind you to their rhetoric and remove your options for dealing with them. It's hyperbole (in most cases) and makes fence-sitters less likely to believe you.

No moral compass?

Their moral compass is defined by christian nationalism. There are in-groups that must be supported and protected (republicans, white "upstanding" americans, whatever they presume that is), and out-groups that must be punished/jailed/worse (LGBTQ+, minorities, anyone left of Ron DeSantis).

They do this because their christian nationalism beliefs inform them that women need to be controlled, and they're using the medical system to do this. If this was Paxton's wife, he would have gotten her an "abortion" without noise, but I struggle to even use that word to describe what this woman needs. Her child is already dead. I mourn for her.

They cannot allow any legal exceptions for the common folk, so this woman must suffer. (Edit: And, this woman is highlighting that their system is unjust, so she is getting punished for it). They believe a woman's place is only as a child rearer, homemaker, and low-skilled labor. It is deeply cruel, true, but they also think it's justified. Ordinary Americans are appalled by these beliefs, and they need to be revealed for what they are.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

There are no good Republicans, they left the party after the response to Jan 6 proved it was beyond redemption.

Cope.

[-] urist 10 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I’m sorry you’ve misinterpreted what I had to say as support for republican rhetoric. There is an internal logic to their actions (which I reject categorically, their logic is wrong and can be argued against). Ignoring why they do things and just saying “they’re evil lol” without explanation gets people to ignore you.

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Don't bother with this guy. I tagged them as "🤡" a while back and it instantly made my browsing experience better.

You're spot on though. If we're going to wrestle this beast, we need to understand it. The problem is complex, and the solution will be too.

[-] urist 3 points 11 months ago

Thanks for the heads up 😺

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 4 points 11 months ago

I didn't misunderstand you.

I addressed your premise that they think they're acting morally.

They don't, that's why they don't mind getting their mistress an abortion, they don't believe anything they say and have no morals.

[-] urist 4 points 11 months ago

I think we’re just having a semantic disagreement then. If you asked a republican why abortion is bad you’ll get an opinion informed by their version of morality.

IMHO, They’re still fine with getting their mistress an abortion because either:

  1. abortion is bad for society on the whole, but my circumstances are different/I made a mistake and i deserve to be able to do this

  2. Some abortions are justified but the circumstances are so rare it’s better to make it illegal. We’re making an omelette, have to break some eggs (oh also, my abortion is one of these justified rarities)

They might feel guilty about doing this, but they absolutely believe they’re doing the right thing after it’s all said and done. It’s very human to not be able to live up to your own ideals, even if your ideals aren’t ghoulishly cruel. Honestly I think that particular type of hypocrisy is worse than some scooby doo villain we can unmask.

They’re not banning abortion for some sort of performance. At least not all of them. They absolutely believe they’re special and moral, so it’s ok if they get one. They’re responsible enough and Jesus will forgive them anyway.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well you won't be the first person to refuse to understand that fascists only approach morality from the perspective of using it for personal benefit.

The single greatest lie they will ever tell you, like any other conman, is that they believe what they say.

[-] luminaree@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

All for a non-viable fetus. Not that it should matter, she should have the right to choose either way, but it makes this particularly insane.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

If I was that woman's husband I would probably be in jail for trying to murder one of these idiots by this point this is infuriating

[-] foyrkopp@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Good thing you're not.

The only thing you'd achieve would be causing her to have to deal with this BS while her husband is in jail.

[-] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago
[-] HerbalGamer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

It's almost funny how they pretend it's a democracy as well.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

You are giving credit to the wrong people by framing it as all women losing a right and men defending that decision.

Tens of millions of American men vote for candidates who protect women’s rights.

Tens of millions of American women vote for candidates who seek to strip women’s rights.

this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
640 points (100.0% liked)

News

23311 readers
3229 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS