In sheer numbers Hamas has done like 40 times better to avoid killing children than israel which knowingly bombs entire refugee camps full of little kids.

It's easier to make the case deaths of children are collateral damage with targeted bombs against military targets than with guns used against unarmed civilians at close range, or blindly fired rockets.

Actually only 29 children died on Oct7 of all the 1200 dead. Including Israeli friendly fire on the Kibbutzes. This shows Hamas did their best to avoid killing children. ... There is not a single video from the Hamas gopros of Hamas shooting children. There are plenty of gopro videos of Hamas shooting the dad but sparing children.

Perhaps. It's unsurprising that Hamas wouldn't release propaganda of such things. I watched a lot of the horrible footage from that day, it certainly didn't give me the impression that they were showing restraint.

I’m not gonna pretend they’re angels but their moral compass is far better than the IDF’s which indiscriminately murders children.

Then your moral compass evidently does not distinguish intent from effectiveness. There's a lot more to it than body count, like who started this conflict, who provoked the latest escalation, and who the intended targets are. I blame Hamas for these deaths by provoking a predictable attack from a superior foe while hiding among Gazan children, I don't blame Israel for using strategies that minimize their own losses even if it means more collateral damage in a nation they are at war with.