119
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 21 points 11 months ago

People here seem unaware that there exists a 3rd option that isn't either gas or induction - a ceramic hob is electric, heated coils under glass, but you can use it with any pot or pan, so there's no need to spend all that extra money replacing all your cookware, and the hob itself is cheaper too.

[-] Phrodo_00@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

And they're terrible at cooking: any change in temperature, including heating up takes a ton.

[-] DessertStorms@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

They've served me perfectly well for over a decade.
The difference in supposed quality wouldn't be noticeable to most while the difference in cost definitely would be. ¯_(ツ)_/¯

[-] huginn@feddit.it 1 points 11 months ago

How much do you pay for electricity?

Because with an induction stove you'll be paying 30% less in cooking costs.

[-] yildo@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago

I like my 2012 electric stove. I don't notice any difference in cooking experience when I use my parents' gas stove at their place, except the flames require more aggressive ventilation

[-] calypsopub@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Not unaware, just not mentioning it as an option because it's so inferior.

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I got an induction system yesterday and ripped my old ceramic one out. I mean, it worked okay apart from the fact that it was slower and would take a while to cool down again.

What always bothered me was not always having the ideally sized one and seeing all the red glow around the bottom of the pot or pan. "Fuck, I'm wasting 30 % energy right now..."

this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
119 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5298 readers
603 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS