297
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

A drug which stops HIV infecting the body has proved to be a highly effective "real-world" preventative treatment, a study has confirmed. The results of the research on 24,000 people taking it across England, have been described as "reassuring".

Thousands of people are already taking PrEP through sexual health clinics.

HIV charity the Terrence Higgins Trust wants easier access to the drug, since many people, including women, do not know it exists.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), which led the PrEP Impact Trial with the Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, said it was the largest ever real-world study of its kind. Funded by NHS England, it was carried out at 157 sexual health clinics across England between October 2017 and July 2020.

The study found use of PrEP, also known as pre-exposure prophylaxis. reduced the chances of getting HIV by around 86% when used in everyday life - taking into account inconsistent or incorrect use. Clinical trials suggested the medication is 99% effective.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SkyeStarfall 25 points 1 year ago

Are they actually??? Jesus Christ, is there no end to their fuckery?

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.

-- C.S. Lewis

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

lol do you actually believe they're doing this for the good of their victims? 🙄

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Do you think fully half of the general population of the United States are downright evil? A bunch of Snidely Whiplashes laughing maniacally as they do things purely to cause suffering?

Of course they think they're doing this for the good of their victims. That's why this is all so pernicious.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Do you think fully half of the general population of the United States are downright evil?

Only half? 🤔

Of course they think they’re doing this for the good of their victims. That’s why this is all so pernicious.

Do you think they kill minorities because they want to help them? Do you think they're bigots because they want to help?

Please reconsider. You have fooled yourself into thinking you aren't surrounded by people with monstrous ideology. The truth is, these people want to kill their enemies. That's it. They want people to die from STDs because they believe they deserve it for sinning. That's it.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It's one of those "greater good", "breaking eggs to make an omelette" things.

I think it's you who's fooling yourself. You're dehumanizing your opponents and therefore losing the ability to understand them. Saying "oh, they're just evil" is giving up. And if you believe in democracy it means that you end up in a situation where you end up letting that "evil" win.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You completely misunderstand, I don't think of them as inhuman monsters. History shows us that this is very human! What I want is for them to be rehabilitated and reeducated; deprogram them from their monstrous ideas and beliefs. They're backwards and need help.

I guess my glib comment about Americans being "evil" was in poor taste. I'm certainly not a moralist!

That doesn't change the fact that these people really do want everyone with STDs to become an untouchable caste, and believe that this is basically God's way of punishing sinners and saving the righteous, and also believe that anyone who cavorts with sinners should be damned. If they had their way, people with STDs would have it tattooed on their forheads and genitals. PrEP would be banned because touching the untouchables is banned, getting an STD would be what you deserve for violating God's divine mandate and sinning.

And that definitely doesn't mean you should bend over backwards to accommodate them.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Regressives believe that their preferences are divine law. Therefore, anything that allows you to do something they don't like without shitty, unnecessary consequences is "encouraging immorality."

One step further, and they enjoy coming up with more shitty, unnecessary consequences to aid the "divine plan" of making people miserable if they don't conform.

You can see this across the board - they're make shit illegal, then conflate the natural problems of the behavior with the added problems of the legal system, and pretend they're all unavoidable.

They hate that gay and trans people have any acceptance, because it makes those same people less likely to be depressed and suicidal, which makes it harder for them to lie and say those people are depressed/suicidal because they aren't cis/straight, rather than because they're treated like crap.

this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
297 points (100.0% liked)

News

29006 readers
3358 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS