361
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by btp@kbin.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

ChatGPT is full of sensitive private information and spits out verbatim text from CNN, Goodreads, WordPress blogs, fandom wikis, Terms of Service agreements, Stack Overflow source code, Wikipedia pages, news blogs, random internet comments, and much more.

Using this tactic, the researchers showed that there are large amounts of privately identifiable information (PII) in OpenAI’s large language models. They also showed that, on a public version of ChatGPT, the chatbot spit out large passages of text scraped verbatim from other places on the internet.

“In total, 16.9 percent of generations we tested contained memorized PII,” they wrote, which included “identifying phone and fax numbers, email and physical addresses … social media handles, URLs, and names and birthdays.”

Edit: The full paper that's referenced in the article can be found here

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Solumbran@lemmy.world 63 points 11 months ago

Publicly available does not mean free to use.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

It also doesn't mean it inherently isn't free to use, either. The article doesn't say whether or not the PII in question was intended to be private or public.

[-] Davel23@kbin.social 28 points 11 months ago

I could leave my car with the keys in the ignition in the bad part of town. It's still not legal to steal it.

[-] Chozo@kbin.social 11 points 11 months ago

Again, the article doesn't say whether or not the data was intended to be public. People post their contact info online on purpose sometimes, you know. Businesses and shit. Which seems most likely to be what's happened, given that the example has a fax number.

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

If someone had some theoretical device that could x-ray, 3d image, and 3d print an exact replica of your car though, that would be legal. That's a closer analogy.

It's not illegal to reverse-engineer and reproduce for personal use. It is questionably legal though to sell the reproduction. However, if the car were open-source or otherwise not copyrighted/patented it probably would be legal to sell the reproduction.

[-] TSG_Asmodeus@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago
[-] j4k3@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

Irrelevant! Your car is uploading you!

[-] Dran_Arcana@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

I absolutely would

this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
361 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31957 readers
388 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS