196
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
196 points (100.0% liked)
politics
18917 readers
3359 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
You're really trying to make this a thing, aren't you?
No, it's already "a thing".
Cool. Who else is using such a stupid childish moniker for voters that Democrats need but would rather insult?
It's all over the 'net for at least a decade and a half. And these types are well known for checking out when their special candidate was not selected (see: some of the "bernie bros") for the general, and then actively work against the party, or tell everyone to vote for Jill Stein or some other destructive type of behavior...
Note, this is a sombunall kind of thing - not all people that wanted bernie then later work against the party. Just like the PUMAs did not do this. Some people might call me a bernie bro or a purity pony as I'd much rather the party was more progressive, but that would be an incorrect usage.
First I heard it was you using it in as many comments as possible in this thread.
As a matter of fact, the latter worked against the party in greater proportion than the former. And Sanders' supporters didn't form a PAC to fundraise for the Republican candidate. Clinton's supporters did exactly that in 2008. And then turned around and screamed at everyone to vote blue no matter who.
Well, I don't think the worst behaviors of PUMAs was the least bit helpful, either. Any more than the dumbest of the Bernie Bros (even though I'd much rather have Bernie in there than either Obama, Clinton, or Biden)...trying to put a stick in the spokes of the party because the front runner was not your personal choice is just so unhelpful.
And I think "Party Unity My Ass" followed by "vote blue no matter who" is the absolute height of hypocrisy.