567
submitted 10 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Raine_Wolf@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

Well there's you're problem! You're disabled, so therefore unprofitable. It's criminal that you have the ability to live while someone who could make profit for our corporate overlords might not. Shame on you for being a leech on society! (In case it wasn't obvious, /S)

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Disabled people are literally paid just to be alive.

Trying to paint reality as a hellish dystopia only works if you say true things.

[-] SnotFlickerman 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Disabled people have to jump through years of hoops for those payments.

Further, the top payout is around $750 a month and they aren't allowed to generate any kind of income outside of that or they will lose it.

This means they can only afford to live in subsidized housing which can take years of being on a waiting list to access.

We pay them far less than subsistence level and many of them end up on the street because of it through no fault of their own.

For five years I gave change to an old man who begged for change while he waited for his name to come up on the housing availability list. He lived out his car the entire time up to that.

We do not pay them to live. We pay them and go "hope you can figure it out" and kick them to the street.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If we subsidize their housing, we're paying for their housing too.

We pay them to be alive, yes. You can argue we could pay them more, and id support that, but we very much pay them just to exist.

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Permanently Deleted

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago
[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

No one? I don't understand the question

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

I’m referring to your comment about disabled people. I can’t imagine being such a piece of shit that I can’t see the value of anyone beyond what money they can bring in through physical labor. What a way to view the world.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Well it's a good thing I never implied anything of that sort.

You ok man?

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Your comment “Disabled people are literally paid to be alive” heavily implies that you view disabled people as though they have no value at all, and are nothing but a drain on society. If I’ve misunderstood, please feel free to explain.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Here's how the conversation went:

  • person mentions having a disability

  • second person chimes in with "society has determined the disabled are useless and we do not care about you"

  • I say "that's not true. We pay disabled people to live."

  • you say "you're a monster who doesn't think disabled people have value"

  • I get very confused

[-] clockwork_octopus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I must have misinterpreted your intent, because to me you came across as incredibly cold and callous. Glad to hear that’s not the case.

[-] SCB@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Literally the exact opposite of the case.

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
567 points (100.0% liked)

News

22907 readers
3207 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS