151
submitted 11 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Oregon’s first-in-the-nation law that decriminalized the possession of small amounts of heroin, cocaine and other illicit drugs in favor of an emphasis on addiction treatment is facing strong headwinds in the progressive state after an explosion of public drug use fueled by the proliferation of fentanyl and a surge in deaths from opioids, including those of children.

“The inability for people to live their day-to-day life without encountering open-air drug use is so pressing on urban folks’ minds,” said John Horvick, vice president of polling firm DHM Research. “That has very much changed people’s perspective about what they think Measure 110 is.”

When the law was approved by 58% of Oregon voters three years ago, supporters championed Measure 110 as a revolutionary approach that would transform addiction by minimizing penalties for drug use and investing instead in recovery.

But even top Democratic lawmakers who backed the law, which will likely dominate the upcoming legislative session, say they’re now open to revisiting it after the biggest increase in synthetic opioid deaths among states that have reported their numbers.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 105 points 11 months ago

And of course nobody even contemplating the idea that they underfunded the resources invested in recovery and that's the change they need to make.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 51 points 11 months ago

Oregonian here. And... Yep. That's it exactly.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.social 20 points 11 months ago

Second Oregonian here, and also yup. We decriminalized but then decided not to require treatment (Portugal method), and then didn't fund treatment anyway.

[-] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Portugal doesn't require treatment. I don't know where this idea came from, but this isn't the first time I've seen this misinformation.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

No one seems to wonder where all our income tax is going. Hmmmmmm

[-] Hider9k@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah fucking right. I work in downtown Salem. It doesn’t matter if half these people have “resources.” They’re here because they can get their fix without being harassed.

You need repercussions in order for addicts to want to get clean. We don’t have any.

[-] nyar@lemmy.world 24 points 11 months ago

Sick, love to see a fascist thinking about criminalizing those who need help, not punishment, the most.

[-] Hider9k@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Massive leap, but typical for a shit for brains. I just work and pay taxes here, but yeah no I’m a fascist because I think people shouldn’t be tweaking on P2P meth in broad daylight in front of our businesses and fucking children.

Are you from Oregon? Do you live here? Do you see it? If not, shut your ignorant fucking mouth. Repercussions include mandatory treatment. I’m not saying we should lock people away in solitary, but the current system of ZERO repercussions whatsoever is not working. Doesn’t make me a fascist to point it out. Go fuck yourself.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

You're going to need to cite your sources that repercussions do anything meaningful for addicts to get clean, as opposed to decriminalized but mandatory treatment (a la Portugal).

[-] Hider9k@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Source: I live and work here, I voted for the law initially and I have seen it fail. IMO this trumps your “a l portugal” source, you ignorant fucking dunce.

Come live and work in our communities and you will see as virtually everyone here does that the measure has failed because there is ZERO INCENTIVE for anyone selling or using these drugs to do anything but continue to sell and use. As I said in a previous comment, repercussions include mandatory treatment. You people are detached and moronic.

[-] whostosay@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Now this is how you convey your point and have people listen. Take notes boys.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Also severe police shortage amidst nationwide increase in crimes. I don't think any of the drug users are getting cited for public drug use at all unless they have to be taken to the hospital.

Edit: I DIDN'T SAY DEFUND. Portland has a massive police shortage. They also STATE that they don't prioritize nonviolent drug use because they don't have manpower.

[-] nyar@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

There isn't a nationwide increase in crime, and there haven't been defundings of the police.

What reality do you live in?

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What the fuck happened here?

Portland has had a police shortage since 2020. I never said anything about defunding. Portland Police also have wait times and aren't responding to non violent drug use calls unless life is in danger.

Crimes are also up Only murder went "down" because it was extremely high post pandemic and hasn't gotten down to prepandemic.

No need to be an asshole about it

[-] gramathy@lemmy.ml 13 points 11 months ago

Have the police tried just working harder, or perhaps pulling themselves up by their bootstraps

[-] Hider9k@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

What a constructive comment. Thank god we have leftists like you adding so much to our government and our community ethos.

[-] gramathy@lemmy.ml 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

“Nobody wants to police anymore” it’s almost like all the things that make the job what it is make it only a job for shitty people

Why is it that “nobody wants to work” is somehow the workers problem for not accepting poor working conditions but “we have a police shortage” falls on society to make things “easier” for them

this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
151 points (100.0% liked)

News

23268 readers
2302 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS