346
Vote for Blood God (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m none of those. Just a person that thinks for themselves and doesn’t let others think for me. I never said not to vote. I just realize that it won’t stop the fascism that’s coming.

Just finished listening to August Nimtz on Upstream podcast. He explains why voting for the lesser evil will always push the economy further right.

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

I don't let others think for me...here's the link to a podcast I got my ideas from.

So, is your galaxy-brain take here that voting for fascism leads to fascism, voting against fascism leads to fascism and not voting leads to fascism and all 3 get us there at the same time? I mean, that sure sounds like you're saying not to vote.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

He’s an expert and a professor, and I am sure he knows eating sausage causes heart disease. Who are you?

[-] Jimmyeatsausage@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I don't doubt the guys credentials...but John Maynard Keynes was an author and Kings College fellow, and he got a lot of shit wrong, too.

Either there's a lot of nuance that you filtered out of his theories, or the guy is playing the same game as Jordan Peterson (another author and professor who likes to talk out his ass).

The only logical conclusion of the argument you made was that voting has no economic or policy outcomes, and all democratic systems will inexorably lead to fascism. There is not sufficient evidence to support that claim.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We will see. I didn’t come to this conclusion from one podcast. It’s been years of reading that did that.

That person you’re replying to sounds like someone who thinks for themself.

Are you upset because their way of thinking isn’t your way of thinking?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Just a guy that reads and enjoys learning about political theory.

Do you listen to Jordan Peterson too?

He’s a professor and some might call an expert, too.

load more comments (20 replies)
[-] SirStumps@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

John Money was a professor and owned his own practice but was found much later to have lied about his data. So being a professor doesn't really mean anything. Why do you as a person believe this other person?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Until Jesus comes back and tells us the truth, which isn’t happening anytime soon, experts appointed by the rigors of science is the closest socially we can get to an arbiter of truth. Individuals may fail us, but the framework still holds value.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Could you summarize his reasoning? A podcast isn’t accessible for a lot of people browsing Lemmy. I’m also not prepared to simply defer to an “expert” when it comes to political science.

I’m skeptical. It doesn’t make much sense to me that the US would be further right under HRC than Trump, who caused a generational shift to the right and literally tried to overthrow the government. Or that the US would be further left under Trump than Biden. Under Biden, we’ve seen some of the most muscular regulation of corporations in a generation.

The North Korean defector in this meme is also celebrated by the alt-right for her “anti-woke” ramblings, which has me questioning this angle.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

His premise is that both Democrats and Republicans are corporatists that will resort to fascism to stave off any movement from the worker class in America. He teaches political science. This has nothing to do with the North Korean meme lady.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

Nothing you said supports the claim that voting for the “lesser evil” always pushes the economy further right.

Voting for abolition ended slavery. Voting for pro civil rights party got us civil rights. Voting for pro-labor politicians got us labor protections and the new deal. And in recent years, Trump oversaw the greatest transfer of wealth to the elite rich in history, while Biden has installed the most aggressively progressive FTC in a century. Against this history of obvious progress, what actual evidence does this guy cite?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Voting for abolition ended slavery.

During the civil war, not at the ballot box.

Voting for pro civil rights party got us civil rights.

After years of protests and violence, not at the ballot box.

Voting for pro-labor politicians got us labor protections and the new deal.

After years of social movements, strikes, violence and a the Great Depression. Not at the ballot box.

Most significant political changes in America happen in the streets, not at the ballot box.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

It was obviously both. The violence without actually implementing the political policies would have been pointless.

Show me an example where voting for the lesser evil leads to the adoption of more right wing policies. That is the specific claim you are supposedly defending.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s not my opinion, it’s August Nimtz’s. I do agree with it though. FDR did the New Deal. Lincoln did the Emancipation, LBJ did civil rights. Public opinion was a factor, but it was the threat of social unrest that enacted them. As for the example of right wing policies, each Democrat caters to corporations. Maybe not as much as the Republicans, but they still do. After Reagan, we voted for the lesser evil Clinton, who did Welfare Reform and repealed Glass-Steagall. After Bush, we voted for the lesser evil Obama, and change. There was no change, he kept Bush’s surveillance state, did more drone strikes and the War on Terror. Promised healthcare, but borrowed it from Romney and the Heritage Foundation. Then after Trump, we settled for the lesser evil and Biden. Who promised his corporate funders that “nothing would fundamentally change.” We still don’t have healthcare, no campaign finance reform, no student loan forgiveness, scuttled a railroad strike, and is currently complicit in a genocide. If you think we are headed in the right direction; by all means vote for Biden. I see the systemic problems with the electoral duopoly and have no misconceptions that if we continue on this path, social unrest will facilitate the state to quell strikes, protests and riots. Business as usual never necessitates change, only the threat of violence from a social movement can do that. But we need to do that now, before it’s too late. I’m not telling you who to vote for, I will vote for Biden myself. But I’m under no illusion about the situation we are in, and what it takes to get out of it. I’m just disseminating information I found helpful and encouraging. It is better to be an informed electorate than an uninformed one.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

You haven’t shown how Democrats led to a further move to the right compared to Republicans. For example, Obama tried to pass universal healthcare with a public option. Zero Republicans voted for it, and the public option was defeated by independent Joe Lieberman. If there were one more Democrat in the senate, we would’ve had universal healthcare.

Meanwhile, Republicans under Trump literally tried to repeal Obamacare. The reason why progressive policies don’t pass is NOT because too many people vote for Democrats, but because too few do.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You haven’t shown how Democrats led to a further move to the right compared to Republicans.

They ain’t moving left.

For example, Obama tried to pass universal healthcare with a public option. Zero Republicans voted for it, and the public option was defeated by independent Joe Lieberman. If there were one more Democrat in the senate, we would’ve had universal healthcare.

Before Sinema, it was Manchin. Before Manchin, it was Lieberman. And if it wasn’t them, it would have been another Democrat. They’re always one vote away. Curious.

The reason why progressive policies don’t pass is NOT because too many people vote for Democrats, but because too few do.

Yeah, why do Progressives’ always have to ask for more rights and a better standard of living? Can’t they just be happy with the way things are?

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

None of these respond to my points. Democrats passed Obamacare. They were one vote away from going even further left with a public option. Meanwhile, Republicans were ALL votes away from any healthcare reform. Claiming that Democrats made the country go further right than Republicans is completely bizarre.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Is it? The Affordable Care Act was a palliative. It served its purpose of pretending to solve a problem, but making it worse. Life expectancy is declining, housing is becoming unaffordable, college tuition continues to rise, there’s a mental health epidemic. Even when Democrats have had control of Congress and the Presidency, nothing substantial changes. Maybe next time, right?

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Yes, the US should’ve also passed a public option. That would’ve made the US system very similar to those in Scandinavian countries (who don’t have single payer btw). But again the reason we didn’t get it is not because we had too many Democrats! Remember: that’s the extreme thesis you’re defending and providing no evidence for.

How do Scandinavian countries get their progressive policies? It’s not by voting for the right leaning party!

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Thank you so much for your patient and clear defense of reason. The person you're arguing with is certainly not arguing in good faith -- they are constantly throwing out partial truths and never once addressing your actual point. You're adding a lot of value in the way you're commenting, and I salute you.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Democrats passed Obamacare.

And have coasted on it for a decade and a half.

[-] SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Yes it’s pretty disappointing. And even worse, during Trump, the US was much closer to repealing Obamacare than extending it.

But why describe this as Democrats coasting instead of blaming Republicans? Are you expecting Democrats to expand publicly funded healthcare without control of the House, and barely controlling the Senate with two conservative Dems?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Nobsi@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

I don't let other think for me. Here's a podcast of a guy that i let think for me.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

It’s not that easy. I don’t agree with everything I watch or hear.

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
346 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

5609 readers
363 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS