115
submitted 10 months ago by throws_lemy@lemmy.nz to c/world@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

noo, i never said all that! that was baro who said no to a ceasefire!

you wanna hear my solution? :o

[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Sure, please tell me your solution for world peace. Please include an acceptable ratio of dead terrorists to dead children, or else i wont know how to think.

(I just want you to know that even though i disagree with you i respect you as a human being, and if i'm being too sarcastic i'm sorry)

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

pls don't make fun of me for my idea, you can make fun of it, but not me! I'm just an idol okay? i sing and dance, i am not a general!!! (;′⌒`)

Amnesty International, the IDF, the US, the EU and the UN all condemn Hamas for using this particular hospital as a base. There has already been footage of Hamas militants using the Hospital. Back in the 80s, Israel expanded the hospital's amenities while also constructing an underground complex for the safety of medical staff. It's unclear how long Hamas has been using it to shelter their forces, the earliest report was in 2008. Here's proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof, proof,

but my hatsune miku solution doesn't really matter whether or not Hamas are indeed there. (even though the IDF bee-lined it to the hospital and all of the above)

First, the Shifa hospital HAS to be entirely surrounded by Israeli forces.

That blue is what IDF has claimed. They are currently in the process of fully surrounding the area. that means a lot of airstrikes, a lot of demolition, a lot of fighting until the hospital is entirely surrounded. Then after that, ceasefire, no more shooting unless it's for self-defence. Shooting the surrounding area of the hospital is prohibited, not allowed.

Israel has complete domination over the ocean and the beaches. I'd set up a temporary fort on the beach or, if using the Gaza Port, setting up barges. The fort will contain heavy armour, soldiers, protective barriers and surveillance equipment like cameras.

Then, create a large pile of humanitarian aid—medicine, food, textiles, water, anything that civilians exclusively need. Fuel can only be transferred and escorted by the IDF and watched to see it be used in the hospital's generators. If those IDF who handle and watch the fuel get killed, then we know Hamas is in the hospital and is stealing it.

There will be marked safety spots through a designated route leading to the supply cache and fort. Aerial drones and hidden cameras will monitor this designed route at all times. Depending on the logistics, you can even supply soldiers with mounted cameras to verify if they shoot at any civilians or shoot first (some IDF soldiers already have these, but they're not released yet). There's also cameras in the distance juuust in case there's missile strikes, we don't want a repeat of that first hospital scare where we didn't know who shot the missile!

Civilians and personnel must travel the route, either in an IDF transport or on foot, gathering what supplies they can (except fuel; only the IDF may transfer that).

The idea is that with such constant surveillance, anyone should be able to verify who shoots first. Hamas or Israel. Israel has set up ceasefires before, but every single time Hamas has never honoured them for very long. Check the proofs for that!

Israel is running out of time with their operations. Remember, they are at war with three separate nations. Logistically and economically, they alone (even with their equipment) cannot last indefinitely. Watch that Northern border with Hezbollah forces! Building these kinds of fortifications and routes takes a lot of time, time which civilians don't have. So in the meantime, if I was israel, I'd drop supply crates in the hospital courtyard. Israel says they are already trying to supply the hospital, but are facing difficulties with skirmishes surrounding the area.

Of course this idea is probably awful! i'm an idol, okay? be nice to me!! ;3;

[-] dwalin@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

I dont really think thats a long term solution. Plus its very risky. Long queues are prime for atacks and large concentrations os angry, hungry people is just a bad idea.

You'll need UN peace keepers around for some years. Palestinians dont really trust idf (understandable). And give back the control of gaza to the legitimate (well, the best we have now) palestinian authority. And start working on a two state solution with real pressure on both sides from the international comunity. Still, it will take decades (see the balkans)

[-] Hatsune_Miku@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

ooh, nuhuh, it's not a long term solution!

this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
115 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38591 readers
1588 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS